We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Cst law
Comments
-
Yes it's 100% correct0
-
I recall the picture had a stamp on it saying served by the solicitors, therefore it hasn't been served by the courts merely issued by them, sent to the solicitors so they could post it and confirm they have served proceedings.
Sheffield may be the local court to the claimant, it may be the local court to the solicitors, it may even just be the court the solicitors commenced court proceedings from.Mortgage started 2020, aiming to clear 31/12/2029.2 -
It sounds like the papers have been correctly served then if they've come from a solicitor and not through MCOL.MovingForwards said:I recall the picture had a stamp on it saying served by the solicitors, therefore it hasn't been served by the courts merely issued by them, sent to the solicitors so they could post it and confirm they have served proceedings.
Sheffield may be the local court to the claimant, it may be the local court to the solicitors, it may even just be the court the solicitors commenced court proceedings from.1 -
It definitely wasn't MCOL and any litigation lawyer would know not to use it and to serve proceedings themselves. Which is what these have done.
Doesn't help OP as he is determined to dispute jurisdiction, but needs to focus on the actual debt and what to do about that. Meter readings, old bills etc would help to work out whether the debt is right or not and this is not the board for this whole issue as not many people use it and other boards are more suitable where people can help with the litigation side and working out if there is a debt or not.Mortgage started 2020, aiming to clear 31/12/2029.1 -
This is absolutely correct. Op you need to start working on a defence as there is no jurisdiction problem. The papers are correctly served for a Scottish case.MovingForwards said:It definitely wasn't MCOL and any litigation lawyer would know not to use it and to serve proceedings themselves. Which is what these have done.
Doesn't help OP as he is determined to dispute jurisdiction, but needs to focus on the actual debt and what to do about that. Meter readings, old bills etc would help to work out whether the debt is right or not and this is not the board for this whole issue as not many people use it and other boards are more suitable where people can help with the litigation side and working out if there is a debt or not.0 -
I had the post in another board but it got removed for some reason0
-
Possibly because the case numbers were left on. I'm guessing though as I haven't seen this anywhere else. I hate to say but the £100 to contest jurisdiction isn't refundable.Regfaeforth said:I had the post in another board but it got removed for some reason0 -
I didn't think it was that much, I though I seen it was only £160
-
Contact one of the board guides and ask them to move this to a more suitable section.Mortgage started 2020, aiming to clear 31/12/2029.0
-
Why has this thread been moved to the Parking Tickets board?0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards