We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

How to move money from cash ISA into the stock market

12346»

Comments

  • FinancialIdiot
    FinancialIdiot Posts: 34 Forumite
    10 Posts First Anniversary
    edited 30 June 2020 at 10:41AM
    masonic said:
    Historically, the difference has not been significant, but the UK market has consistently underperformed the global index as a whole, so a passive fund with a UK overweight will have had a tendency to have underperformed one that does not. But it isn't that simple, as there will be other differences between those funds which may reduce or even overcome that deficiency.
    ..........
    As to the downsides of holding too many funds, there are a few:
    ...........
    For the sorts of portfolios I've been talking about I thought the 'internal workings' were taken care of for you. You just pay a flat fee and the portfolio sits in your ISA doing what it does without your further involvement (other than to check its performance periodically). So as I understood it there's no extra cost or effort (to the investor) in having both portfolios in an ISA compared to having just one, right?
    Anyway, it sounds (from what you're saying) as if, on balance, you would favour choosing the non-home-biased (i.e. HSBC) portfolio rather than the home-biased Vanguard one when choosing between them?
  • masonic
    masonic Posts: 27,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    For the sorts of portfolios I've been talking about I thought the 'internal workings' were taken care of for you. You just pay a flat fee and the portfolio sits in your ISA doing what it does without your further involvement (other than to check its performance periodically). So as I understood it there's no extra cost or effort (to the investor) in having both portfolios in an ISA compared to having just one, right?
    That's correct if you buy just one fund. If you spread your money around multiple funds and the performance of those fund is different, you would need to rebalance your portfolio back to its target allocations from time to time, which is additional effort over a single fund solution, and potentially additional cost.
    Anyway, it sounds (from what you're saying) as if, on balance, you would favour choosing the non-home-biased (i.e. HSBC) portfolio rather than the home-biased Vanguard one when choosing between them?
    I don't have a strong view on home bias. My portfolio has no home bias. If you decide to go with a fund that has home bias, I think you should have a reason for choosing it over the more natural, global, allocation. 
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.