We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Tenency querey

13»

Comments

  • elsien said:
    So what specific reason have UW given your dad for blocking the transfer, when he asks them the direct question?
    As an aside talking about reading the landlady the riot act and putting her back in her box is not particularly helpful because a)you don't have a contract with her,  and b) rubbing her up completely the wrong was may well have repercussions for your dad.
    It is possible to be both assertive and polite. 
    Exactly so it is best to let it slide and let her make her UW commission because even being polite and assertive like I have rubs her up the wrong way and continuing to do that by pressing on with a utility switch could and most probably would result in repercussions for my Dad.

    They we’re trying to say that they weren’t the supplier so they hadn’t blocked the move but they were in the process of switching back to them at the landlady’s request as she requested this once her previous tenant did a runner. Apparently the previous supplier was Fisher Energy and Foxglove energy which I believe are the gas and electric divisions of one company, yet when my Dad spoke to someone else at UW they told him that EDF were the previous supplier. The UW agents and the landlady are all as bad as each other as I don’t believe a word that comes out of there mouth.

    The landlady is now saying she will get a £200 fine if he leave UW and they will come and remove all the energy saying lamps that are fitted (there is the odd one fitted) also she states my father has had smart meters fitted before he moved in for his gas and electric, all free of charge for his benefit (regardless of them being free anyway). When I corrected her that they weren’t smart meters as smart meters automatically submit the meter readings and that she even had to come and read the meter manually when my father moved in, she reverted back to the usual defence tactic of it’s nothing to do with you and it’s in the TA.
  • macman
    macman Posts: 53,129 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 12 June 2020 at 4:53PM
    You really are over-complicating this. The only possible hitch to switching supplier is if he has signed up to a UW tariff that has exit fees, so you need to tell us the tariff name, which is on the bill. The LL is talking utter cr*p about being fined if he switches, or about them removing light bulbs, it's pure fantasy.
    I can see no way that she can find out he has switched, but, if you are concerned that she might (possibly through loss of commission on her UW account?), then it may well be best to let let sleeping dogs lie, because otherwise she sounds mad enough to serve him with an S21 at the end of his AST just to be spiteful. 
    That is a decision only you can help him with.
    At the very least, get yourself access to his UW account, either online or as a permitted 3rd party.
    Otherwise, as was pointed out back in the 2nd post, such a term in the TA is unenforceable and can be ignored.

    No free lunch, and no free laptop ;)
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.