📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

VLS100 and 60

Options
If you blend VLS100 and VLS60 50x50 does  it simply gives you VLS80? I first thought if I have both, I balance risk. But if I get one VLS80 it should give me the same result, right? 
«13456

Comments

  • daveyjp
    daveyjp Posts: 13,557 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    More or less,  there is certainly little point having two different risk levels of VLS.

    You decide the risk you want and invest accordingly.
  • jaybeetoo
    jaybeetoo Posts: 1,366 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    You'll have to rebalance them every so often as they will grow (hopefully) at different rates.
  • btcp
    btcp Posts: 310 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    daveyjp said:
    More or less,  there is certainly little point having two different risk levels of VLS.

    You decide the risk you want and invest accordingly.

    That’s what I thought. It’s my first year investing so took me a little bit of time to start questioning why I bought initially. Especially reading about people who have diversified portfolio 
  • bowlhead99
    bowlhead99 Posts: 12,295 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Post of the Month
    edited 10 June 2020 at 5:57PM
    btcp said:
    That’s what I thought. It’s my first year investing so took me a little bit of time to start questioning why I bought initially. Especially reading about people who have diversified portfolio 

    The VLS 80 is already a diversified portfolio in one product. It has more money invested into equity funds than VLS 60% Equity, but less than VLS 100% Equity:

    As at date 30 Apr 2020:

    Vanguard FTSE U.K. All Share Index Unit Trust 19.5%

    Vanguard U.S. Equity Index Fund 19.4%

    Vanguard FTSE Developed World ex-U.K. Equity Index Fund 19.2%

    Vanguard Global Bond Index Fund 14.0%

    Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index Fund 6.5%

    Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe ex-U.K. Equity Index Fund 5.5%

    Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4.6%

    Vanguard Japan Stock Index Fund 3.3%

    Vanguard U.K. Government Bond Index Fund 2.6%

    Vanguard U.K. Inflation-Linked Gilt Index Fund 1.8%

    Vanguard U.K. Investment Grade Bond Index Fund 1.5%

    Vanguard Pacific ex-Japan Stock Index Fund 1.5%

    Vanguard FTSE 100 UCITS ETF 0.6%

    Vanguard U.K. Government Bond UCITS ETF 0.0%

  • ColdIron
    ColdIron Posts: 9,844 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Hung up my suit! Name Dropper
    edited 10 June 2020 at 6:04PM
    btcp said:
    If you blend VLS100 and VLS60 50x50 does  it simply gives you VLS80? I first thought if I have both, I balance risk. But if I get one VLS80 it should give me the same result, right? 
    In terms of equity/bond split it will, at least initially. But since over time you would expect the 100% equity fund to grow more than the 60% one you may end up with something closer to a VLS85 and may require rebalancing to restore the split. The VLS would do this for you automatically
    When Vanguard construct these funds they do so assuming you will have one of them not a mix and match of several of them. What components that make sense for a single fund may make less sense with some sort of blend
    Most people would settle on a single professionally built fund
  • btcp
    btcp Posts: 310 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Based on the above recommendations it sounds like I should sell one of the funds and invest in the other one, depending on my risk attitude.
  • eskbanker
    eskbanker Posts: 37,205 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    btcp said:
    Based on the above recommendations it sounds like I should sell one of the funds and invest in the other one, depending on my risk attitude.
    Surely you'd sell both of the funds (60 and 100) and buy the third (80) unless you've now decided your risk attitude is actually equivalent to 60 or 100 after all?
  • btcp
    btcp Posts: 310 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    eskbanker said:
    btcp said:
    Based on the above recommendations it sounds like I should sell one of the funds and invest in the other one, depending on my risk attitude.
    Surely you'd sell both of the funds (60 and 100) and buy the third (80) unless you've now decided your risk attitude is actually equivalent to 60 or 100 after all?
    Exactly. I just need to figure out what is my attitude to risk.
  • Sailtheworld
    Sailtheworld Posts: 1,551 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    btcp said:
    eskbanker said:
    btcp said:
    Based on the above recommendations it sounds like I should sell one of the funds and invest in the other one, depending on my risk attitude.
    Surely you'd sell both of the funds (60 and 100) and buy the third (80) unless you've now decided your risk attitude is actually equivalent to 60 or 100 after all?
    Exactly. I just need to figure out what is my attitude to risk.
    You'll have to work it out for yourself but the the videos Lars Kroijer made to accompany his book Investing Demystified are a worthwhile watch if you're thinking about risk https://www.kroijer.com/
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.