We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

SDLT Extension of the three year time limit within which to sell a previous home.

13»

Comments

  • SDLT_Geek said:
    ...There is a similar problem for a person who (if they are to escape the 3% surcharge) needs to complete the purchase of a new home within three years of the sale of an old home (because they own another property).
      
    Representations have been made to Government to allow an exceptional circumstances extension in this situation as well.  I heard today that this idea had been considered by Government, but was rejected.  So it seems likely that the exceptional circumstances extension will only apply to cases where the old home cannot be sold within the three years following the purchase of the new home.
    Hi and thank you SDLT_Geek. We are caught under exactly these circumstances - unable to complete purchase within 3 years. We had a purchase lined up that would have been within the 3 year limit but it fell through during the early 2020 lockdown and we are now outside the time limit. Any more information you could provide whether there is a way around this would be much appreciated. It's hard to see why extensions are allowed for delayed sales but not purchases.   
  • SDLT_Geek
    SDLT_Geek Posts: 2,988 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    jasperc_2 said:
    SDLT_Geek said:
    ...There is a similar problem for a person who (if they are to escape the 3% surcharge) needs to complete the purchase of a new home within three years of the sale of an old home (because they own another property).
      
    Representations have been made to Government to allow an exceptional circumstances extension in this situation as well.  I heard today that this idea had been considered by Government, but was rejected.  So it seems likely that the exceptional circumstances extension will only apply to cases where the old home cannot be sold within the three years following the purchase of the new home.
    Hi and thank you SDLT_Geek. We are caught under exactly these circumstances - unable to complete purchase within 3 years. We had a purchase lined up that would have been within the 3 year limit but it fell through during the early 2020 lockdown and we are now outside the time limit. Any more information you could provide whether there is a way around this would be much appreciated. It's hard to see why extensions are allowed for delayed sales but not purchases.   
    Unfortunately the three year time limit is strict for cases where the purchase of the new home is after the sale of the old home.  There is no provision for extension for exceptional circumstances.

    The 3% extra would be due presumably because of another property owned.  Could that other property first be disposed of?  Perhaps to a limited company?
  • Yes, I bought a BTL flat in 2018 as an interim measure after selling my main residence - pending finding a house I actually wanted to live in. I've been renting since, using the BTL income to cover my rent.

    I've reviewed whether to sell the flat into a limited company. The costs (even with the SDLT reduction) are likely to be between £10 and £12k. Mostly mortgage redemption penalty costs and the SDLT itself. Minor cap gains. 

    I'm not trying to avoid paying higher rate SDLT for a second property - it just seems we are paying it on the wrong house - our main residence! It seems rather unfair and I have no idea what the logic could be for excluding delayed purchases from the Covid extension. 

    Thanks for your help :) 
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.