We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Is everyone as confused as me?
GDB2222
Posts: 26,880 Forumite
I can’t find the latest advice and rules on how many people can get together in public spaces. There seem to be groups of 30 partying together, which seems to be a bit risky. The only rules I can find say the maximum is 2, but that’s dated a week ago. I thought that a figure of 6 was mentioned?
Or are all rules now discredited?
No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?
0
Comments
-
This seems to be the latest update from a week ago.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/staying-alert-and-safe-social-distancing/staying-alert-and-safe-social-distancing
All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.
Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.0 -
The rules still remain, one person may meet one other from outside the household, only in a public open space, not at home, and keep 2 m apart. Different rules in Northern Ireland, I think.
OR, if you invite Dominic Cummings you can do whatever you like with whoever you like.1 -
Though he wasn't with anybody else other than a familiy member.Grumpy_chap said:
OR, if you invite Dominic Cummings you can do whatever you like with whoever you like.
Seen enough far worse breaches around here to write a book.
Looking after oneself is common sense really. As long as the disease exists there's going to be a risk.0 -
Looking after one self is one thing but really driving 30 miles to check eyesight is ok who does that? and if really that concerned you would not take wife and child with you.Thrugelmir said:
Though he wasn't with anybody else other than a familiy member.Grumpy_chap said:
OR, if you invite Dominic Cummings you can do whatever you like with whoever you like.
Seen enough far worse breaches around here to write a book.
Looking after oneself is common sense really. As long as the disease exists there's going to be a risk.2 -
If someone has eyesight issues they shouldn't be driving at all.sharpe106 said:
Looking after one self is one thing but really driving 30 miles to check eyesight is ok who does that?Thrugelmir said:
Though he wasn't with anybody else other than a familiy member.Grumpy_chap said:
OR, if you invite Dominic Cummings you can do whatever you like with whoever you like.
Seen enough far worse breaches around here to write a book.
Looking after oneself is common sense really. As long as the disease exists there's going to be a risk.
0 -
It was suggested in one of the briefings, that if he was concerned about his eyesight why couldn't his wife have driven or if it was sooo important, a car could have been sent for him.
But yes, I have seen far worse transgressions that that in the last 10 weeks0 -
Long running thread already on DC. Maybe we could keep it to that one?All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.
Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
