We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Does increasing pension contributions avoid tax?

13»

Comments

  • Cam93
    Cam93 Posts: 72 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary 10 Posts
    thanks for the help everyone, however excuse my ignorance - how do i know if my pension contributions are pre or post tax? Would it show me / be able to be worked out from a payslip?


  • Nuggy96
    Nuggy96 Posts: 232 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    can someone explain this? assuming it's salary sacrifice,
    Where an employee in a scheme operating relief at source is a higher or additional rate taxpayer they can claim back the rest of the tax relief themselves from HMRC either by writing to them separately or through their annual self-assessment tax return.
    what can be claimed back? because if it's done at source you're automatically not paying the 20% or 40% income tax because it's been taken out of your pensionable salary.
    if someone could post examples with figures to demonstrate that would be useful, i'm contemplating doing additional voluntary contributions
    You are just misunderstanding the terminology:

    A 'relief at source' scheme means you are using money out of your net pay to make some additional contributions to the scheme, and basic rate relief will straight away be claimed by the provider from HMRC. By contributions out of net pay, I mean your gross salary has already been taxed on your payslip, and the payments to the pension firm are paid out of the net-of-tax money that is left - which could have  all gone to your bank account if you were not making contributions

    The provider, upon receiving the cash (which was paid to it out of your net-of-tax pay) will go to HMRC and claim basic rate tax relief. For every £80 the pension company takes from you, the pension company will immediately claim £20, because effectively the money going into the pot has come from you, out of your own already-taxed money, and that tax needs to be 'relieved' to get a bigger gross amount in the pension pot (£100 of gross pension pot for every £80 of contributions).  Although, they are only allowed to claim the basic rate gross-up, because they don't know your full personal tax situation, and if you need higher rate relief you will need to inform HMRC and pursue that element of it yourself.

    In your example, of "salary sacrifice" the method of making contributions is by sacrificing salary and saying to your employer that you don't want the gross salary at all. As your employer changes your contract to not pay you the high level of gross pay for the work you do for him - and instead pay you some lower level of pay, and more employer pension contributions instead - it is true that you are 'automatically not paying' tsome taxes that would have otherwise been due, because you are not getting as much gross pay. You would simply be taxed correctly on your lower gross pay, and no relief can be claimed on that because you have paid the correct amount of tax. The untaxed money that the employer puts into the pot, as gross contribution from their own bank account, just goes direct to the provider where it is dumped into your pension pot.

    So on a contribution made by way of salary sacrifice, the provider does not claim any relief, because the source was the employer's own funds, which have not suffered any payroll taxes and do not need any relief -  rather than being net-of-tax money that was on your payslip and destined for the employee's bank account. 

    Whereas on a contribution made outside salary sacrifice, the money was on the net side of your payslip and would have gone to your bank account for you to freely spend, and you agree for it to be deducted from that net money and sent to the pension provider; the pension provider will claim basic relief for you.

    Example 1 (ignoring NI to keep the percentages nice and clean):
    You earn £80000 so are well into high rate tax.
    You join a pension scheme by way of salary sacrifice, agreeing to contribute 12.5%, £10,000. 
    The employer changes your gross pay to £70,000 and gives £10,000 to the pension provider for your pot.
    As your gross pay is £10,000 lower, the income tax you pay is £4000 lower (40%) and your net pay drops by £6000. No 'relief' is needed, you will simply pay the correct tax on your lower salary.

    Example 2
    Facts same as example 1. You decide you would like to get more money into your pension so you agree with your employer to take even more money off you by way of £2000 salary sacrifice.
    They take your salary down further, to £68000, and give the pension provider an extra £2000 for your pot.
    As your gross pay is £2000 lower, you will save £800 tax (40%) and your net pay drops by £1200.  No 'relief' needed, you will simply pay the correct tax.

    Example 3
    Facts same as example 1, where you have agreed to be 'earning' £70,000 and getting a large additional £10000 sal-sac pension contribution on the side.
    You decide to make an extra pension contribution and it will not be by way of salary sacrifice but simply out of the net pay you were going to get.
    You agree to have £1600 taken from your net pay and given to the pension company.
    The pension company receives the £1600 and claims basic rate relief-at-source on your behalf, collecting £400 from the taxman and adding it to your pension pot, giving £2000 in the pot.

    In example 3, as your gross pay was unchanged, the tax you pay via payroll is unchanged. However, part of that tax you paid  via payroll has been relieved by the operation of the pension provider's 'relief at source' claim, because you have got £2000 in the pension for a cost of only £1600.  But you know that as a higher rate  40% taxpayer, a £2000 pension investment should only really cost you £1200 net, and you have paid £1600, which is too much.

    So to resolve this problem you tell HMRC that the amount of your extra pension contribution and basic rate tax relief was £2000.  They agree to extend the 'basic rate band' by £2000 (e.g. from £50k to £52k) so that £2000 of income that was going to be taxed at 40% will now only be taxed at 20%. This will save you 20% of £2000 i.e. £400.

    If your PAYE code was not adjusted during the year for this (i.e. you were still paying tax at 'normal' rates on your £70,000 salary despite making this additional pension contribution on the side), you will have overpaid £400 tax, and HMRC will send you a cheque or a direct transfer to your bank account.

    - So in example 2 (extra contribution via sacrifice) the reduction of salary got you £2000 of pension investment during the year and reduced your net-of-tax pay by £1200 during the course of the year.

    - While example 3  (salary unchanged, additional contribution from net pay), the extra contribution got you £2000 of pension investment during the year and reduced your net-of-tax pay by £1600 during the course of the year, but HMRC gave you £400 back outside the pension at the end of the year, so the overall effect on your bank account is still £1200 and the overall effect on your pension is still £2000.

    So, that's how tax relief works. In real life, example 2 is better than example 3 if the employer offers this method, because dropping your salary by £2000 saves 2% of employee's national insurance (£40), improving your net pay... and sometimes employers are grateful for your lower salary saving their own employer's national insurance bill, and will happily give you some of that money as a further contribution into your pension too.


    That was a very simplified yet highly detailed explanation. Thank you!
  • lr1277
    lr1277 Posts: 2,199 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    One more thing to consider is that your taxable salary may be used to work out things like benefits, pay rises (depending on your organisation) and a few other things I can't remember.
    I don't know if you saw for some people who received furlough pay, didn't get as much as they thought because their taxable salary (i.e. after pensions and other deduction like cycle to work scheme) was much lower than their gross salary.
    I did see a list somewhere but for the life of me I can't remember exactly where. Perhaps a BBC news article but not sure about that.
    HTH.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.