We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
TIF group not paying out on curtailment - help


Probably very similar to a few threads, but I'd just like some advice here. I was due to fly back on 31st March from New Zealand but decided to curtail my trip on 23rd March, but obviously I could not. Anyhow I eventually got a flight on 4th April back to England.
TIF Group are saying they will not pay for the flight on the 4th April as the flight was after my trip originally finished. The problem I have with any policy is it down to interpreation. I curtailed my trip on the 23rd/24th March. I have stacks of evidence; 3 different flights and reciepts or my original method of bus travel. They have not said I can't claim on curtailment, just that they won't pay out because of the trip "ended" on the 4th April. However I have proved to them I tried to curtail on 24th March, I just was not able to board the plane due to transit restrictions. So in summary, I curtailed my journey I just was unable to get out before 4th April on FCO advice.
Further to this the customer service has been horrendous- sent on an extra wild goose chase. Letters have been sent to me left, right and centre unformatted correctly, different font sizes- very inprofessional. Then in the rejection letter they claim I should claim from my trip provider or credit card company (despite the fact I was already abroad) and they call me by my surname and not my first name. Second time they have done this too. So all just basic things- I told them I can't have confidence they can do their job and analyse a claim if they can't even format a letter template.
Long story short, is this worth fighting with them or are they just never ever going to pay out? I can only claim £1250 of which they take £100 and my expenses are £1550 so I'm already in negative equity! If so, what are the next steps I should do? I've just sent them a complaint email tearing their response to pieces and also explaining why I believe I have a claim against their policy wording.
Appreciate the advice.
Comments
-
All you can do is battle with the insurance company if they still refuse to pay out after your complaint take it to the Ombudsman.
I am wondering if there are other ways you can get money back.
What kind of trip was you on? who did you buy it from? what method of payment did you use?
New User name as MSE gave me a number in my old one.
" I am not a number! I am a free man!"0 -
Life__Goes__On said:All you can do is battle with the insurance company if they still refuse to pay out after your complaint take it to the Ombudsman.
I am wondering if there are other ways you can get money back.
What kind of trip was you on? who did you buy it from? what method of payment did you use?
I honestly don't think I can get the money back from the extra flight I had to buy (£1,313) apart from anyone except the insurer. It seems like a classic word of my interpretation of the policy against theirs.0 -
Seems like you are in a battle, at least you won't have to pay to get your case to the Ombudsman (but it does cost the insurance company)
Was it just flights via STA, or was any accommodation paid for at the time you bought the flight?
New User name as MSE gave me a number in my old one.
" I am not a number! I am a free man!"0 -
Life__Goes__On said:Seems like you are in a battle, at least you won't have to pay to get your case to the Ombudsman (but it does cost the insurance company)
Was it just flights via STA, or was any accommodation paid for at the time you bought the flight?
I am prepared to be in a battle and I'm happy to go to the Ombudsman. I've already threatened it, but I'll keep pushing it. They did not outright dismiss my claim of curtlailment which was positive but the fact I ended up coming home after my original planned date is challenging (although through no fault of my own). The bigger problem I have is they obviously have not investigated the claim properly and of course they keep calling me by my surname, which I suspect is a company error as all my travel documents are correct.
0 -
If I'm reading it correctly you had flights from STA booked for 31st March, you booked flights to come home earlier ( Qantas) but they were cancelled then you booked flights for the 4th with Malaysia Airlines?
If that is the case who was the airline you were meant to fly home with on 31st March? (I take it that was cancelled)
New User name as MSE gave me a number in my old one.
" I am not a number! I am a free man!"0 -
Life__Goes__On said:If I'm reading it correctly you had flights from STA booked for 31st March, you booked flights to come home earlier ( Qantas) but they were cancelled then you booked flights for the 4th with Malaysia Airlines?
If that is the case who was the airline you were meant to fly home with on 31st March? (I take it that was cancelled)0 -
STA had a duty to get you home, so that is one avenue you could look at, you could claim against them for the extra cost that was involved. (STA broke the contract you had with them)
So if you haven't had a refund for the cancelled flight (31st Mar), you can bill STA for the cost of the 4th April flight and not claim the refund
This will be under "consequential loss"
Consequential loss, is the loss (in this case your 4th April flight) that occurred because of the breach of contract (the cancelled 31st March flight)
New User name as MSE gave me a number in my old one.
" I am not a number! I am a free man!"0 -
Life__Goes__On said:STA had a duty to get you home, so that is one avenue you could look at, you could claim against them for the extra cost that was involved. (STA broke the contract you had with them)
So if you haven't had a refund for the cancelled flight (31st Mar), you can bill STA for the cost of the 4th April flight and not claim the refund
This will be under "consequential loss"
Consequential loss, is the loss (in this case your 4th April flight) that occurred because of the breach of contract (the cancelled 31st March flight)
This is a worst case scenario as it appears after last week they have handed my insurance claim over to a different advisor. They want a letter from STA stating I could not use the original ticket (technically I could, but I was advised by STA over the phone to "wait it out" a week earlier. Also trying to communicate with them at 13 hours time difference (and they shut on a Sunday) was challenging, context around why I would not leave until 4/4 and proof from Qantas that I could not re-use the booking. But as I thought, taking apart the policy and threataning to use the Financial Ombudsman seems to have at least done the trick for now.0 -
jcrennie said:Life__Goes__On said:STA had a duty to get you home, so that is one avenue you could look at, you could claim against them for the extra cost that was involved. (STA broke the contract you had with them)
So if you haven't had a refund for the cancelled flight (31st Mar), you can bill STA for the cost of the 4th April flight and not claim the refund
This will be under "consequential loss"
Consequential loss, is the loss (in this case your 4th April flight) that occurred because of the breach of contract (the cancelled 31st March flight)
This is a worst case scenario as it appears after last week they have handed my insurance claim over to a different advisor. They want a letter from STA stating I could not use the original ticket (technically I could, but I was advised by STA over the phone to "wait it out" a week earlier. Also trying to communicate with them at 13 hours time difference (and they shut on a Sunday) was challenging, context around why I would not leave until 4/4 and proof from Qantas that I could not re-use the booking. But as I thought, taking apart the policy and threataning to use the Financial Ombudsman seems to have at least done the trick for now.
I doubt STA will just pay up as they are wrongly withholding other payments, so I believe you would need to take court action.
With regard to the insurance, state that you had verbal instructions from STA to "wait it out", and in legal terms this carries the same weight as written instructions, so this must be used as evidence. You can also state this has been backed up with many Ombudsman's rulings, that have used such evidence.
New User name as MSE gave me a number in my old one.
" I am not a number! I am a free man!"0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.1K Spending & Discounts
- 244.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards