We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Transfer Final salary questions.

Options
1235»

Comments

  • jimi_man
    jimi_man Posts: 1,404 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    garmeg said:
    jimi_man said:
    £16k a year, with 2% inflation until 88 gives just under £600k. Personally I'd want more than that to make up for the lack of security. 

    £448k seems rather low. 
    Not comparing like with like. The lump sum is now whereas the pension amount is, on average, 15 years in the future.

    I agree the CETV is low. I was offered £400k for a 9k early retirement pension with an NRA of 62. I declined the offer.
    Agreed. I wasn't so much comparing, as showing what the DB pension provides over a lifetime. I suppose the key is what sort of income £448k could provide and for how long. 
  • Got my CETV finally end of last week, bit under what I was expecting,448k versus 16k (ish) at 60.

    Still can't make up my mind!
    Got my CETV finally end of last week, bit under what I was expecting,448k versus 16k (ish) at 60.

    Still can't make up my mind!

    By coincidence I had almost exactly the same offer- £447K for £16k(ish)  . However my NRA was at 65 , so from that point of view your offer your offer is worse. On the other hand my DB pension conditions - increasing with RPI ( max 5%) and two thirds spouse pension are quite good. 
    I did not take it for the usual reasons but also because I already have a substantial DC pot ( the DB pension is from past employment ) so did not make sense to put all my eggs in one basket. 
    RPI linkage is a usefull insurance in times of potentially poorly performing markets and a risk of inflationary pressures. 
    But surely depends on how the linking is structured - i.e. capped or not?
  • cfw1994
    cfw1994 Posts: 2,124 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Hung up my suit! Name Dropper
    jimi_man said:
    £16k a year, with 2% inflation until 88 gives just under £600k. Personally I'd want more than that to make up for the lack of security. 

    £448k seems rather low. 
    Indeed: if you assumed 2% growth on whatever is in the pot each year, 448K would peter out after about 30 years.
    Of course, if you managed 3%, you get another 7 years from it.....& also, if your state pension means you don't need as much from "the pot", you can either spend a bit more earlier, or leave a tidy inheritance.
    Decisions decisions!
    Plan for tomorrow, enjoy today!
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 1 August 2020 at 3:38PM
    Got my CETV finally end of last week, bit under what I was expecting,448k versus 16k (ish) at 60.

    Still can't make up my mind!
    Got my CETV finally end of last week, bit under what I was expecting,448k versus 16k (ish) at 60.

    Still can't make up my mind!

    By coincidence I had almost exactly the same offer- £447K for £16k(ish)  . However my NRA was at 65 , so from that point of view your offer your offer is worse. On the other hand my DB pension conditions - increasing with RPI ( max 5%) and two thirds spouse pension are quite good. 
    I did not take it for the usual reasons but also because I already have a substantial DC pot ( the DB pension is from past employment ) so did not make sense to put all my eggs in one basket. 
    RPI linkage is a usefull insurance in times of potentially poorly performing markets and a risk of inflationary pressures. 
    But surely depends on how the linking is structured - i.e. capped or not?
    Even the caps tend to be well above inflation rates experienced in the UK for a very long time. 


  • Heisenberg01
    Heisenberg01 Posts: 112 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 10 Posts
    edited 7 August 2020 at 2:07PM
    Seems I'm looking at 7-10k to set up (payable upfront),and 1% of portfolio per annum  for management.

    Does this seem reasonable/ going rate?
  • BritishInvestor
    BritishInvestor Posts: 955 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 500 Posts Combo Breaker Name Dropper
    edited 7 August 2020 at 4:34PM
    Seems I'm looking at 7-10k to set up (payable upfront),and 1% of portfolio per annum  for management.

    Does this seem reasonable/ going rate?
    Upfront seems ballpark. 1% ongoing on a pot of £448k (if read you posts correctly) is at the higher end, so if you're paying this I would expect a lot more than an annual visit to discuss how the funds have performed. Might be worth digging a bit more on this.
  • Seems I won't be transfering anytime soon then, don't have a spare 10k,and I'm not going into debt for it.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.8K Life & Family
  • 257.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.