We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Staircasing vs Selling

Hi all - I'm hoping there's someone who knows a bit more about this than me, so here goes!
TLDR: do I staircase from 30% to 100% then sell, or just sell the 30% share?
My partner currently has 30% ownership in the flat we live in. We are looking to buy a house as we need a bit more space. The flat has gone up by around £20,000 in value since he purchased a few years ago, and we want to maximise the equity he can get out so we have the best possible deposit going forward. At this juncture our options are as follows:
  • Staircase his share up to 100%, with/without me on the new mortgage and then sell
  • Sell the 30% share
My understanding is that there's a cost to staircase, plus the new mortgage would be on the current value and not the value my partner originally purchased at. I've reached out to a few finance companies who don't seem to know how to advise me or where to point me. I'm not sure on the best course of action that will leave us with the most money at the end. All advice appreciated!
Thanks :smile:

Comments

  • Comms69
    Comms69 Posts: 14,229 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    I'm confused why you think staircasing would in anyway mean you have more money?

    The flat is valued at X, you either pay 0.7 of X to staircase to 100%, or you cash out the 0.3 you currently own.
  • edgex
    edgex Posts: 4,212 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Nowhere near enough info to go on.
    Are other local properties that are shared-ownership selling?
    What are the costs for the staircasing, as in fees etc?
    Would a new mortgage be available, & if so would it be a better rate?
    etc etc etc
  • Comms69 said:
    I'm confused why you think staircasing would in anyway mean you have more money?

    The flat is valued at X, you either pay 0.7 of X to staircase to 100%, or you cash out the 0.3 you currently own.
    Because it would mean we'd own 100% of the property and I'm really green when it comes to staircasing/part ownership as I've not dealt with it before. We'd be taking a mortgage on the 100% less whatever equity we have in it. 
  • edgex said:
    Nowhere near enough info to go on.
    Are other local properties that are shared-ownership selling?
    What are the costs for the staircasing, as in fees etc?
    Would a new mortgage be available, & if so would it be a better rate?
    etc etc etc
    Local properties are selling but the estate agent who valued our flat a few months ago couldn't tell me if they'd sold at 100% or part buy. 
    There's a flat rate fee (which I'll need to look up) for staircasing plus solicitors fees.  Plus any new mortgage arrangement. 
    A new mortgage is available at around the same rate but obviously for more money as the mortgage is currently only on 30% of the property. 
    Even an idea of what I need to look into would be great. Thank you so far 
  • blue_max_3
    blue_max_3 Posts: 1,194 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Surely waiting and hoping for a reduction in value, would mean it was cheaper to go to 100%
  • edgex
    edgex Posts: 4,212 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    You've spotted one issue with staircasing, namely that there's fees, & possibly re-arranged mortgage, each time you do it. That could be £2000. So, if your going to do it you do it the least number of times possible.
    In your case, there is also the issue that the value has gone up. So, you could double the size of the mortgage but only end up with 50% ownership. That is unlikely to change the sell-ability.

    To maximise the equity for a deposit, you need to reduce the existing mortgage. If you've got enough cash to cover the staircasing costs, either put that towards the existing mortgage or the deposit. If you can afford to, overpay the mortgage as well.
  • blue_max_3
    blue_max_3 Posts: 1,194 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I have to say, I'm pretty cynical about shared ownership. However, surely the point is that people can buy something, rather than rent forever. I don't think the 100% makes a particularly attractive offer. You're more likely to find someone who wants to buy at the lower level in my opinion.
  • csgohan4
    csgohan4 Posts: 10,600 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I have to say, I'm pretty cynical about shared ownership. However, surely the point is that people can buy something, rather than rent forever. I don't think the 100% makes a particularly attractive offer. You're more likely to find someone who wants to buy at the lower level in my opinion.
    But possibly could be false economy and you end up paying more, SO usually leasehold  and your at the mercy of freeholders and the repair costs are not cheap, But suitable for others, not for others
    "It is prudent when shopping for something important, not to limit yourself to Pound land/Estate Agents"

    G_M/ Bowlhead99 RIP
  • blue_max_3
    blue_max_3 Posts: 1,194 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    csgohan4 said:

    But possibly could be false economy and you end up paying more, SO usually leasehold  and your at the mercy of freeholders and the repair costs are not cheap, But suitable for others, not for others
    I'm not sure you understood - I was suggesting to leave it at 30%. Personally wouldn't touch it with a bargepole at any price, but they are probably more likely to snare someone with a cheaper offer.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 246K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.8K Life & Family
  • 259.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.