We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Landlord being difficult.
Comments
-
Once the tenancy has ended, the property should be vacant. If not, the tenant can be considered to be still in residence and liable to pay double rent. It is worth getting the property cleared on, or before, the date the tenancy ends.It's not difficult!
'Wander' - to walk or move in a leisurely manner.
'Wonder' - to feel curious.0 -
Once the tenancy ends, the landlord will be entitled to dispose of any rubbish you've left behind and take the costs out of your deposit. Up to you whether you want to arrange clearance yourself or accept that there will be a deposit deduction.I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.0
-
hb2 said:Once the tenancy has ended, the property should be vacant. If not, the tenant can be considered to be still in residence and liable to pay double rent. It is worth getting the property cleared on, or before, the date the tenancy ends.The relevant law, the Distress for Rent Act 1737, has on occasion been used when the tenant themselves remains in the property. But has there been any case of a landlord using it for a tenant who left belongings in the house? I strongly doubt the law would be interpreted that way.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
