We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Just park app used but it bought ticket for wrong car park - What to do, now sent a £ 170 bill !!

You will see from a decision  from POPA they state i did not clearly show i had used the companies phone app, but i send screen shots of phone just park application purchased and invoice of ticket purchase at the time of arrival.

I feel it was the tech and not me i bought a ticket, tech got wrong place it was totally not intentional.

Any advise welcome.

Cheers

Andy

Decision  Unsuccessful

Assessor Name      Ashlea Forshaw

Assessor summary of operator case

The parking operator has issued a Parking Charge Notice (PCN) to the motorist for, “unpaid tariff time”.

The appellant says that he used the providers phone application to purchase a ticket on arrival however, the application must have been faulty as it purchased a ticket for a car park 30 miles away. He says that as you can see, this was by no way an offence as he bought a ticket with the providers said system on arrival that would have covered his time in car park. He says that the application must be able to tell them he had paid for that time and if that's the case, the application should have emailed him to advise of the error but he feel that they are looking to gain income from fines. To support this appeal, the appellant has provided evidence of payment


Assessor supporting rational for decision

The appellant has appealed as the driver of the vehicle. Therefore, I will be assessing driver’s liability in this case. The signage displayed at this site states the following: “Parking Tariffs Apply, up to Hours £3.20… failure to comply with the terms and conditions will result in the issue of a 

£100 PCN”. The parking operator has issued a Parking Charge Notice (PCN) to the motorist for, “unpaid tariff time”. The operator has provided copies of its signage displayed at the site, along with a site map. Further, the operator has provided camera images which were captured by the Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) cameras. The images show the appellant entering the site at 12:54 and exiting at 14:44, totalling a stay of one hour and 50 minutes. The operator has provided a transaction report showing that no payment was registered against the appellant’s vehicle, ******** that day. On the face of the evidence, I consider it looks like there is a contract between the appellant and the operator, and the evidence suggests the terms have not been met. I now turn to the appellant’s grounds of appeal to determine if they make a material difference to the validity of the parking charge notice. The appellant has said that he used the providers phone application to purchase a ticket on arrival however, the application must have been faulty as it purchased a ticket for a car park 30 miles away. Having assessed the appellant’s evidence of the receipt for payment, I can see that he has paid £2.70 for parking. He has provided evidence of a second receipt, showing that payment was made to ‘Cornwall council’. I must note that the payment that the appellant made, was not valid in this private car park. The signs at this site clearly advise of a 

‘Justpark’, pay by mobile service. The screenshot that the appellant has provided does not show which mobile app he used to make a payment. I cannot determine if this was the ‘justpark’ app. Therefore, I consider the appellant’s evidence to be insufficient to prove that there was an issue with the operator’s payment app that day. Ultimately, the signs advise of the parking tariffs available at the site. For the appellant to park for one hour and 50 minutes, he was to pay the ‘up to 2 hours’ tariff of £3.20. The payment of £2.70 that the appellant made does not correspond with the tariffs at this site. Therefore, I am satisfied that the appellant made a payment for the wrong car park. By paying for a council car park, this meant he was not authorised to park in the Initial Parking car park. The operator’s service is not designed to advise the motorist of any errors he has made regarding paying to park at another site. It is his responsibility to check the signs, and to make the correct payment to the correct operator. On this occasion, he has not. I therefore conclude that the PCN has been issued correctly and so, this appeal must be refused.

Comments

This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.