We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
How to evict Tenant not paying rent
Comments
-
The occupants definitely can't be squatters, because they've been granted permission to stay in the property by the tenant.
3 -
I agree - hence reflected and suggested they are either subtenants or licencees. I was initially clutching at straws on behalf of the OP!Poster_586329 said:The occupants definitely can't be squatters, because they've been granted permission to stay in the property by the tenant.
1 -
greatcrested said:
I agree - hence reflected and suggested they are either subtenants or licencees. I was initially clutching at straws on behalf of the OP!Poster_586329 said:The occupants definitely can't be squatters, because they've been granted permission to stay in the property by the tenant.Thank heavens for small mercies - it could be this crew living there:But don't worry, it's not a recent video. You can tell, because they've got pasta!1 -
Yeah I know legally they're not but they still are in my mind. It is what it is. One good thing to come out of it is that they are liable for the council tax for the duration of the covid-19 restrictions so every cloud eh? lolPoster_586329 said:The occupants definitely can't be squatters, because they've been granted permission to stay in the property by the tenant.0 -
Definitely thank heaven's for small mercies!Poster_586329 said:greatcrested said:
I agree - hence reflected and suggested they are either subtenants or licencees. I was initially clutching at straws on behalf of the OP!Poster_586329 said:The occupants definitely can't be squatters, because they've been granted permission to stay in the property by the tenant.Thank heavens for small mercies1
![[Deleted User]](https://us-noi.v-cdn.net/6031891/uploads/defaultavatar/nFA7H6UNOO0N5.jpg)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=inKF9zp3hxE
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards