Check the defense please

Le_Kirk

Hockey_player said:

Le_Kirk said:

Since the bulk of the document is to be unchanged, we only needed to see your particular circumstances added into paragraphs #16 & #17.

Please advise if this fit in The DEFENCE 

16.       The Defendant is not the main/only ...........

Paragraph 16 is as written by Coupon-mad, so, if it fits your case, leave it in.  Paragraph 17 seems to be about signage and could perhaps be combined with paragraph 18, which is also about signage.  I would just add (since you seem to going down the route of not being the driver on the day) that "the defendant carried out research after having received the PCN and has discovered that the signs are .............."

Hockey_player

could you advise please what this statement refers to in the par 3:   The court’s attention is drawn (but not limited to) parts 6, 10, 14 and 18 of the list of terms that are likely to be unfair.
Is it about the terms on the sign? or is it to the paragraphs on the DEFENCE? 

Le_Kirk

Hockey_player said:

could you advise please what this statement refers to in the par 3:   The court’s attention is drawn (but not limited to) parts 6, 10, 14 and 18 of the list of terms that are likely to be unfair.
Is it about the terms on the sign? or is it to the paragraphs on the DEFENCE? 

Referring to the Consumer Rights Act (CRA) 2015.