We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

12 week forced isolation

2»

Comments

  • steve_2012
    steve_2012 Posts: 182 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    jimnev said:
    Because he is high risk why should he lose pay over it when he could be working. He feels he is being penalised for being high risk.
    i keep feeling like the extremely vulnerable (with nhs letters or texts) are being financially penalised, my wife has worked right through her cancer treatment, to be on friday last week told/asked to stay off for 12 weeks, 2 weeks pay then use your holiday pay 3 weeks, then SSP, i think its an outrage when others are getting 80% and maybe plus 20%, the self-employed will shortly get similar, yet those who are likely to burden the nhs are penalised.

  • p00hsticks
    p00hsticks Posts: 14,910 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Thanks for putting me right. To my mind being told to stay at home is more like self isolation than social distancing, but that's just my view. It is tough to be told to stay at home with no pay and no prospect of earning for 12 weeks. Universal credit then.
    To throw some more terminology into the mix, it sounds like the OP is describing 'shielding' rather than either 'self isolation' or 'social distancing'.  This is the term being used to describe protecting those identified by the NHS as being the most vulnerable due to their medical history and who have been told not to leave their homes AT ALL for twelve weeks, other than for essential medical treatments (such as chemotherapy).



  • unforeseen
    unforeseen Posts: 7,451 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    The 12 week isolation is still self isolation. What the NHS & government put out about high risk people is still only advice and it is up to the individual whether to take it or not. (although they would be an idiot to continue attending a workplace) 
    A far as I can see, SSP would be claimable. 


  • steve_2012
    steve_2012 Posts: 182 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    The 12 week isolation is still self isolation. What the NHS & government put out about high risk people is still only advice and it is up to the individual whether to take it or not. (although they would be an idiot to continue attending a workplace) 
    A far as I can see, SSP would be claimable. 


    I don't see it self isolation in my wife's situation, firstly my wife was told not to return to work for up to 12 weeks, this was last Friday, then on Monday she got the extremely vulnerable NHS text.
    In the first instance it's an instruction from her employer, the second from the nhs is advice.
    All I'm saying is she shouldn't be left in a financial situation that's any different to those that receive furlough payments or what the self-employed will get over the next few days.

This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.2K Life & Family
  • 260.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.