ParkingEye Defense Letter - 10 Minute Overstay

Coupon-mad

You have missed all the points I made for you earlier:

It's nearly there for a P/Eye defence but needs a bit added about the fact it is unlikely that their landowner authority allows them to disregard the BPA CoP about grace periods, and chucking in mention of a lack of a 'legitimate interest' in pursuing genuine customers whose actual parking time did not exceed the allowed hours, and adding in mention of the BPA/Kelvin Reynolds article, like this one:

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6110926/parking-eye-county-court-claim-form-received/p1

Well_Well

I thought I had included landowner authority and Kelvin Reynolds, but couldn't find a good template for legitimate interest - could you provide a link where i could find this? And could you tell me what's missing from the landowner authority and Reynolds please?

Well_Well

Coupon-mad said:

You have missed all the points I made for you earlier:

It's nearly there for a P/Eye defence but needs a bit added about the fact it is unlikely that their landowner authority allows them to disregard the BPA CoP about grace periods, and chucking in mention of a lack of a 'legitimate interest' in pursuing genuine customers whose actual parking time did not exceed the allowed hours, and adding in mention of the BPA/Kelvin Reynolds article, like this one:

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6110926/parking-eye-county-court-claim-form-received/p1

I went back through the link you provided:
1. Landowner authority was included in hatman's first defence but then removed in the second version??
2. Legitimate Interest is not included in hatman's defence or at least I can't see it??
Would appreciate helpful guidance not off hand remarks

D_P_Dance

I thought that PE had their own legals in house, are they therefore allowed to add on an extra £50.  

Well_Well

D_P_Dance said:

I thought that PE had their own legals in house, are they therefore allowed to add on an extra £50.  

I've read so many threads now, but your comment rings a bell - with PE you can't/shouldn't include unreasonable costs within the defence. I think you may be correct, can anyone confirm or comment further? 

Umkomaas

D_P_Dance said:

I thought that PE had their own legals in house, are they therefore allowed to add on an extra £50.  

Pretty much water well under the bridge, from a long, long time ago. That tack has been tried almost from the day Rachel Ledson sold her soul to the devil some 7 years ago. Nothing to be gained from sending absolute newbies off on a wild goose chase. 

http://parking-prankster.blogspot.com/2013/06/how-much-do-parkingeye-pay-rachel-ledson.html

This is hard enough as it is!

Well_Well

Thanks very much for the valued information 

Coupon-mad

Well_Well said:

I thought I had included landowner authority and Kelvin Reynolds, but couldn't find a good template for legitimate interest - could you provide a link where i could find this? And could you tell me what's missing from the landowner authority and Reynolds please?

I just found loads in two seconds flat, by Googling 'legitimate interest true parkingeye moneysavingexpert' (seeing as the search function on this forum is horribly broken, Google is better and the word 'true' finds defences not random stuff).

e.g. this one:

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5900766/parkingeye-claim-form-ticket-june-2018

Easy when you know what to Google.

Well_Well

Coupon-mad said:

e.g. this one:

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5900766/parkingeye-claim-form-ticket-june-2018
Easy when you know what to Google.

Thanks, I was using the forum search. This is much appreciated. I think I'm there now and will submit today. Thanks all.
I'll also let you all know how it goes in time.

D_P_Dance

I have been on this board for years and still struggle mightily with the forum search.