We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Abuse of Process -- supplementary
Options
Comments
-
Let me re phrase this. We know of the threat-o-grams written by scammers but it's when it goes to court?
The dodgy legals who operate in the scam always add £60. BWLegal recently told the SRA that they act on their clients instructions. Based on that, we must assume that it is the parking company who adds the fake £60 ? BUT DO THEY?
Both legals and parking companies are misguided if they believe the CoP's give them the legal right to add fake amounts. Both the BPA and IPC say they can and because the BPA and the IPC go against the law and the Beavis case, the spankings going on which will increase can be attributed to the rubbish produced by the ATA's
Parking Eye seem to understand the law and do not add fake amounts even though the BPA suggest fake amounts can be added..
The moral for parking companies ...
"If you believe the rubbish your ATA tells you, EXPECT a spanking in court"
2 -
Does it matter who adds it? Surely it is up to the solicitor to satisfy themselves that it is lawful.You never know how far you can go until you go too far.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards