We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
DB Pension Funds - What happens as the pensioners die off?
Comments
-
Although a PLC was in essence family run. Sold company in 1999 to a US private equity firm. As family heavily involved there was a vested interest in maintaining the solvency of the scheme for all members. Never had any concerns. In other circumstances would have taken a different route.ffacoffipawb said:
Lucky call. 100% protection too.Thrugelmir said:Schemes cost money to run and require considerable administration effort. The sponsoring company will no doubt wish to offload the responsibility of a closed scheme at the earliest available opportunity.
Around three years ago I was offered a CETV to leave a DB scheme that closed to new members in 1999. Declined the offer. In December last year advised that my benefits were to be transferred and underwritten by an insurance company. In essence an annuity linked to RPI.0 -
Brynsam, this is the situation facing several small plumbing firms in Scotland,principal can not retire because of this.Play with the expectation of winning not the fear of failure. S.Clarke0
-
In many, perhaps most cases, there would be a buyout to an insurance company as already said if a scheme got below a critical mass of members.
The deficit is a snapshot in time, and is not 'accurate' in the sense that nothing can be accurate when so many assumptions are involved about a stream of cashflows extending into the blue yonder. Valuations on a solvency basis are on such a conservative basis that no scheme would be invested in the full matching assets - if they were anywhere near fully funded on this basis, they would/should have done a buyout.
There will be schemes falling into the lifeboat. The concerns would be that if conditions became dire enough that the lifeboat itself might become too full.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.6K Life & Family
- 261.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards