📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Where to invest now the coronavirus has hit the markets

1246789

Comments

  • We have OEIC's investments with Co-Funds who are owned by Aegon. Due to coronavirus, does anybody know whether or not we should cash these in?
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Do you need the money now? 
  • coyrls
    coyrls Posts: 2,515 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Marxie9 said:
    does anybody know whether or not we should cash these in?
    No    
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 119,993 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Marxie9 said:
    We have OEIC's investments with Co-Funds who are owned by Aegon. Due to coronavirus, does anybody know whether or not we should cash these in?
    The answers will be the same as every other thread and post where the person has asked the same thing.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • 2_4
    2_4 Posts: 26 Forumite
    10 Posts First Anniversary
    Are there any funds designed specifically to try and cash in on any recovery?

    I normally invest in very broad funds such as the Vanguard 100 but don’t want to expose myself to companies with a fair probability of not surviving, which I feel such a wide-ranging fund is likely to do.
  • kinger101
    kinger101 Posts: 6,579 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    2_4 said:
    Are there any funds designed specifically to try and cash in on any recovery?

    I normally invest in very broad funds such as the Vanguard 100 but don’t want to expose myself to companies with a fair probability of not surviving, which I feel such a wide-ranging fund is likely to do.
    There are a number of "recovery" funds that target companies the have had some sort of setback but in the opinion of the managers, have good potential for recovery.  Read through some of these.  Nearly every company now meets the criteria for setback, so they're not based on global or national recoveries per se.
    https://www.trustnet.com/fund/search/recovery
    The question, like always, is whether the fund manager's opinion worth their fee?   Looking through many of them, they've been waiting a very long time for RBOS and Lloyds to recover.
    "Real knowledge is to know the extent of one's ignorance" - Confucius
  • doe808
    doe808 Posts: 452 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Added to an infrastructure fund, but thats it. Business as normal otherwise.
    If it hadnt been for Fidelity texting me the other day- I would have no idea of the exact value of what I hold at the moment, bar a rough calculation in my head.
    Total - £340.00

    wins : £7.50 Virgin Vouchers, Nikon Coolpixs S550 x 2, I-Tunes Vouchers, £5 Esprit Voucher, Big Snap 2 (x2), Alaska Seafood book
  • 2_4 said:
    Are there any funds designed specifically to try and cash in on any recovery?

    I normally invest in very broad funds such as the Vanguard 100 but don’t want to expose myself to companies with a fair probability of not surviving, which I feel such a wide-ranging fund is likely to do.
    Why wouldn't you want to expose yourself to companies which may not survive? Their prices have been marked down (further than the market as a whole) to reflect the risk that they won't survive. Some won't survive, and will lose shareholder's money; but others will, and their prices will bounce back more strongly when it turns out they're pulling through after all.
    Wanting to avoid such companies is contradictory to wanting to cash in on any recovery. Because it's the worst hit companies that have the potential to let you cash in on a recovery, if things get better sooner or faster than the market is currently allowing for. They also have the potential to do worse than the market, if things turn out worse than current market prices imply.
    In short, I see no reason to move away from very wide-ranging funds (such as VLS 100) in the current situation. Such funds include exposure to a broad range of both companies which are worse affected by the current crisis (but with greater recovery potential) and companies which are less affected (but with less recovery potential).
  • bowlhead99
    bowlhead99 Posts: 12,295 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Post of the Month
    edited 29 March 2020 at 11:44AM
    tropic_of_Username019 said
    Why wouldn't you want to expose yourself to companies which may not survive? Their prices have been marked down (further than the market as a whole) to reflect the risk that they won't survive. Some won't survive, and will lose shareholder's money; but others will, and their prices will bounce back more strongly when it turns out they're pulling through after all.
    Wanting to avoid such companies is contradictory to wanting to cash in on any recovery. 
    Hear hear.
    Though personally I am being selective about the things in which I invest, and still have a good chunk of sideline money, it's clear that companies that are cheap because they might die or never recover, are the ones that stand to gain the most in share price if they do recover.

    A typical cap-weighted index fund may not be the best way to capitalise on such opportunities of course, because if you put new money into such a fund it will spend the money by allocating the least of it to the companies with the smallest valuations and most of it to the companies with the largest valuations.  That said, the UK All-share index held by VLS100 provides about 8 times as much exposure to something like  (e.g.) Lloyds Bank which has fallen close to 50% since mid-December than it does to (e.g.) HICL Infrastructure which has fallen less than 5% over that timeframe  (former is £25bn market cap, latter is £3bn). So you do get access to some big name companies at depressed valuations which will hopefully recover over time.
  • 2_4 said:
    Are there any funds designed specifically to try and cash in on any recovery?

    I normally invest in very broad funds such as the Vanguard 100 but don’t want to expose myself to companies with a fair probability of not surviving, which I feel such a wide-ranging fund is likely to do.
    Why wouldn't you want to expose yourself to companies which may not survive?
    I would have thought that is pretty obvious. If the companies do not survive you lose 100% of your investment.

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.