We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
No DSS tenants
Comments
-
Not all LL are equal, same for tenants. But ultimately, the LL can choose how much risk to take, but as it's a business it would be a bad business to allow a higher risk tenant to rent the place. Nothing personal but business, LL are not a charity and also have their own bills to pay.Cakeguts said:We have had a house to let recently where the next door neighbour works night shifts and sleeps during the day so we automatically turned down anyone who had multiple children or who wanted to become a student again in case they disturbed him. Is that discrimination? In that situation we would not be letting to someone who didn't work under any circumstances in case they annoyed the neighbour. The neighbour is also a private tenant but we are not their landlord. This is just polite to do this.There are multiple reasons as to why a landlord does not want to let to someone with 3 children or to someone who is not working. Not just the Universal Credit one.
It is well documented the costs for eviction and the time frame which can be up to 12 months, court costs are substantial too
Not all LL are multi millionaires and even if they were, noone would be happy with letting tenants go into arrears and cause damage"It is prudent when shopping for something important, not to limit yourself to Pound land/Estate Agents"
G_M/ Bowlhead99 RIP2
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
