We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
We're aware that some users are currently experiencing errors on the Forum. Our tech team is working to resolve the issue. Thanks for your patience.

PCN for parking in own (leased residential) space

Looking for some advice from knowledgeable people on how to phrase the appeal and whether it is likely to be accepted or if I can expect to go to court (it's with Link who apparently don't respond well to appeals). Based on looking at other threads, I think the main point to emphasise is the primacy of the lease, and therefore that I do not have a contract with the parking company. The relevant sections are:
"Property: shown edged red on the plan attached to this lease (referred to as "your apartment" in the Leasebook) and where included with the apartment the car parking space also shown edged red on the plan"
"If the management company has an obligation, that obligation includes making sure that its staff, workmen and agents and anyone authorised by it comply as well. If they do not comply, the management company is responsible"
"We give the management company such rights over the building and the estate as it reasonably needs in order to fulfill its obligations in the lease and the leases of other apartments"
"If you pay the rent and comply with your other obligations under the lease you may enjoy your apartment without any disturbance from us or from anyone claiming under or in trust for us" [note "us" = the landlord rather than the management company]
"You must not allow any car parking space that may be included with your apartment to be used by anyone who is not living in or visiting your apartment. You must keep the parking space clean. The following are prohibited in the car park: refuelling (except in an emergency); vehicle repairs (except in an emergency); vehicle maintenance; and engines must not be kept running longer than reasonably necessary."
"You are responsible for and must indemnify us and the management company against all claims and demands made, all proceedings brought, and all loss and liability arising, directly or indirectly, from: (a) the use and occupation of your apartment; (b) the condition of your apartment; (c) anything you or anyone else at your apartment does or fails to do; (d) any breach of your obligations under your lease; except where we or the management company are made responsible under your lease, or where we or those for whom we are responsible or the management company have caused the loss or liability"

There's nothing in there about changes to the lease as far as I can see.
Questions are:
1) Any key points to include in the appeal wording?
2) I've contacted the management company and they say they don't get involved in disputes with Link. But based on the above, can I hold the management company responsible (as Link is their agent) for failure to respect my quiet enjoyment?
3) My girlfriend parked the car (mine) in my numbered space but didn't notice the permit was on the floor rather than the dashboard. Does this change anything?

Thanks in advance!






Comments

  • Redx
    Redx Posts: 38,084 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Doesn't matter what is in any appeal , link will reject it , we would advise you to appeal as keeper using the blue text template from the newbies FAQ sticky thread near the top of the forum , no changes

    Link do have form for issuing court cases
  • D_P_Dance
    D_P_Dance Posts: 11,593 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    More more reading here

    http://parking-prankster.blogspot.com/2016/11/residential-parking.html


    https://forums.landlordzone.co.uk/forum/residential-letting-questions/1053920-private-parking-companies

    Nine times out of ten these tickets are scams, so consider complaining to your MP, it can cause the scammer extra costs and work, and has been known to get the charge cancelled.

    Parliament is well aware of the MO of these private parking companies, many of whom are former clampers, and on 15th March 2019 a Bill was enacted to curb the excesses of these shysters. Codes of Practice are being drawn up, an independent appeals service will be set up, and access to the DVLA's date base more rigorously policed, persistent offenders denied access to the DVLA database and unable to operate.

    Hopefully life will become impossible for the worst of these scammers, but until this is done you should still complain to your MP, citing the new legislation.

    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2019/8/contents/enacted

    Just as the clampers were finally closed down, so hopefully will many of these Private Parking Companies.





    You never know how far you can go until you go too far.
  • Thanks for the quick responses. I had read both of those links pretty sure I'm in the right not paying here but given the amount of work I have on at the moment would prefer to avoid the hassle of court. Is there anything more I could say to the management company to get them to call Link off or is my only option appeal and wait for a court letter?
  • Half_way
    Half_way Posts: 7,719 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    A few pointers:
     Primacy of lease ( as already stated)

    if you displayed a permit you only did/do this as a courtesy entirely at your own discretion , a courtesy that you no longer wish to continue with and will return the permit upon receipt of a stamped addressed envelope

    The imposition of an unregulated private parking company is unreasonable  and its

    The management company is jointly and severally liable for the actions of its agents ( the parking company)




    From the Plain Language Commission:

    "The BPA has surely become one of the most socially dangerous organisations in the UK"
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.