We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Defensive Global Funds

2»

Comments

  • aroominyork
    aroominyork Posts: 3,475 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Defensive can mean companies that operate in sectors which are less vulnerable to a general economic recession, or also stocks which have a 'defensive moat' in terms of a dominant market position with high entry barriers. Both of these types of stock should be inherently cash generative in most cases, which assists with capex/dividend funding.
    Sorry, but I think that further confuses. I see defensive as being less venerable to the economy, but not as having moats. Companies with barriers to entry can be highly vulnerable to a recession: I would not consider them defensive.
  • Sorry, but I think that further confuses. I see defensive as being less venerable to the economy, but not as having moats. Companies with barriers to entry can be highly vulnerable to a recession: I would not consider them defensive.

    Fair point, but being 'defensive' in relation to being less vulnerable to the economy doesn't work either at times. Look at Food Retailing - price wars and disrupter entrants didn't really help them much. My bigger point is that there are a number of stocks that were perceived as defensive, for either reason I described that were actually quite vulnerable to disruptive entrants. 

  • aroominyork
    aroominyork Posts: 3,475 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Then it's a question of defensive stocks vs. defensive sectors. Generally defensive is discussed in the context of sectors, and that's certainly more relevant to the OP. 
  • Prism
    Prism Posts: 3,849 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Then it's a question of defensive stocks vs. defensive sectors. Generally defensive is discussed in the context of sectors, and that's certainly more relevant to the OP. 
    I would say not always. Healthcare is a defensive sector but includes biotech for example. I would say there needs to be an emphasis on resilient (defensive) companies as much as the sector itself, especially if considering an active fund. In terms of passive then I guess quality is the closest match
  • I have held BNY Mellon Global Income from it was previously Newton Global Income. I hold this along with some Global IT's.
    I like the spread of companies it invests in.

  • StellaN
    StellaN Posts: 354 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary 100 Posts
    I have held BNY Mellon Global Income from it was previously Newton Global Income. I hold this along with some Global IT's.
    I like the spread of companies it invests in.

    The OP is already considering a similar option in the Evenlode Global Income fund along with Bankers Investment Trust and the Troy Trojan Global Equity fund.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.