We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Defensive Global Funds
Comments
-
Sorry, but I think that further confuses. I see defensive as being less venerable to the economy, but not as having moats. Companies with barriers to entry can be highly vulnerable to a recession: I would not consider them defensive.MarkCarnage said:Defensive can mean companies that operate in sectors which are less vulnerable to a general economic recession, or also stocks which have a 'defensive moat' in terms of a dominant market position with high entry barriers. Both of these types of stock should be inherently cash generative in most cases, which assists with capex/dividend funding.
0 -
Sorry, but I think that further confuses. I see defensive as being less venerable to the economy, but not as having moats. Companies with barriers to entry can be highly vulnerable to a recession: I would not consider them defensive.
Fair point, but being 'defensive' in relation to being less vulnerable to the economy doesn't work either at times. Look at Food Retailing - price wars and disrupter entrants didn't really help them much. My bigger point is that there are a number of stocks that were perceived as defensive, for either reason I described that were actually quite vulnerable to disruptive entrants.
0 -
Then it's a question of defensive stocks vs. defensive sectors. Generally defensive is discussed in the context of sectors, and that's certainly more relevant to the OP.0
-
I would say not always. Healthcare is a defensive sector but includes biotech for example. I would say there needs to be an emphasis on resilient (defensive) companies as much as the sector itself, especially if considering an active fund. In terms of passive then I guess quality is the closest matcharoominyork said:Then it's a question of defensive stocks vs. defensive sectors. Generally defensive is discussed in the context of sectors, and that's certainly more relevant to the OP.
0 -
I have held BNY Mellon Global Income from it was previously Newton Global Income. I hold this along with some Global IT's.I like the spread of companies it invests in.
0 -
The OP is already considering a similar option in the Evenlode Global Income fund along with Bankers Investment Trust and the Troy Trojan Global Equity fund.takesyourchances said:I have held BNY Mellon Global Income from it was previously Newton Global Income. I hold this along with some Global IT's.I like the spread of companies it invests in.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards