📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Incorrect Invoice / Dispute over damage to electrical cable

13»

Comments

  • davidmcn
    davidmcn Posts: 23,596 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    garth549 said:
    Do you have legal cover on your home insurance?  If so that's your best point of call by far.
    Home insurance legal cover isn't going to cover your business's liabilities.
  • Ectophile
    Ectophile Posts: 8,007 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    What outcome are you looking for?  In your initial post you seemed to be suggesting that there was an administrative problem around the invoices.  Now it seems you're trying to avoid paying altogether.
    I'm looking to understand whether my partner is actually liable or not, given the evidence in possession of both parties, and to what extent. I guess I was trying to understand whether the continuing administrative errors add weight/justification for denial of liability (although I'm hearing loud and clear that it doesn't). There are processes regarding correct invoicing found on the gov. uk website (invoicing and taking payments from customers) which haven't been followed in this situation, so why should we play by the rules when they aren't?  Whether it would have been 'worded correctly' (i.e. he was held liable under the correct legislation at least!) or not we would still be contesting the amount. It just doesn't feel right to be billed over £700 for a cable that was laid too shallowly and was exposed via careful-hand digging as stipulated by HSG; it only adds salt to the wound that the administrative errors keep on rolling in. 
    You seem to be trying to weasel out of paying using a technicality.
    I would have thought that you would be better off arguing that your partner was not negligent because he had no way of knowing that the cable was there, and he was taking appropriate care when digging the hole.  If he wasn't negligent, then he isn't liable.

    If it sticks, force it.
    If it breaks, well it wasn't working right anyway.
  • Smartlucinda
    Smartlucinda Posts: 5 Forumite
    Name Dropper First Post
    edited 19 February 2020 at 9:28AM
    @Ectophile, very fair comments. There was never any intention to 'weasel' but instead to understand whether there was even any point arguing about using safe digging practices when he wasn't even being held negligible under the correct legislation initially and even when that was corrected the guidelines are written in favour of the power companies anyway. 
  • garth549
    garth549 Posts: 486 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts
    davidmcn said:
    garth549 said:
    Do you have legal cover on your home insurance?  If so that's your best point of call by far.
    Home insurance legal cover isn't going to cover your business's liabilities.
    Sorry missed the point about it being a business job
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.