We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

FT - Tories to raid tax relief pensions

12829303133

Comments

  • Paul_Herring
    Paul_Herring Posts: 7,484 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 11 March 2020 at 4:34PM
    Sharing accomodation is no different from sharing a bottle of wine
    Of course it is. Two people can share a house, without infringing on the other's use of it. They don't get "half a house each" - they both have all of it.
    Two people sharing a bottle of wine only get half that bottle each.
    For a couple to get the same utility as a single person from a bottle of wine, they'd need to buy two bottles of wine. Not so with the house.
    Leaky abstractions FTW!

    Conjugating the verb 'to be":
    -o I am humble -o You are attention seeking -o She is Nadine Dorries
  • zagfles
    zagfles Posts: 21,545 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Chutzpah Haggler
    Sharing accomodation is no different from sharing a bottle of wine
    Of course it is. Two people can share a house, without infringing on the other's use of it. They don't get "half a house each" - they both have all of it.
    Two people sharing a bottle of wine only get half that bottle each.
    For a couple to get the same utility as a single person from a bottle of wine, they'd need to buy two bottles of wine. Not so with the house.
    Leaky abstractions FTW!


    So single people can share a house with another single person then! Problem solved, no "infrigment" on their use, according to you!
  • Mick70
    Mick70 Posts: 749 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 500 Posts Name Dropper
    On bbc news it mentions tax paid on pensions of high earners including doctors to be recalculated .
    so what exactly has changed ? That’s all the bbc says 
  • Mick70
    Mick70 Posts: 749 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 500 Posts Name Dropper
    https://www.ft.com/content/517b2687-331d-4fca-b080-ce531c074035
    Makes sense now ,  seems like had no intention of amending the LTA 
  • Paul_Herring
    Paul_Herring Posts: 7,484 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 11 March 2020 at 6:15PM
    Mick70 said:
    On bbc news it mentions tax paid on pensions of high earners including doctors to be recalculated .
    so what exactly has changed ? That’s all the bbc says 
    The taper thresholds where the £40,000 you're allowed to put into a pension reduces have been increased by £90,000


    £110,000->£200,000
    £150,000->£240,000
    £210,000->£300,000


    Edit: Your FT link is paywalled.

    Conjugating the verb 'to be":
    -o I am humble -o You are attention seeking -o She is Nadine Dorries
  • Gary1984
    Gary1984 Posts: 377 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper
    The tapering down of the annual allowance now starts at £200k instead of £110k. So you can earn up to £200k and still be entitled to pay £40000 into your pension (or accrue the equivalent benefits in a DB scheme) like everyone else. 
  • ratechaser
    ratechaser Posts: 1,674 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Let's just reflect on that taper change for a moment. Anyone with an adjusted income between £210-240k (ahem...) and who wants to maximise their pension allowance, ends up with an effective tax rebate of £13,500, i.e. 45% of the £30k pension allowance that they will be getting back from no longer being tapered down to the £10k minimum.

    By any measure that's extraordinarily generous, and could be the equivalent of about 15% of the tax paid on their whole income.

    All in all, not a bad budget!
  • marlot
    marlot Posts: 4,972 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Let's just reflect on that taper change for a moment. Anyone with an adjusted income between £210-240k (ahem...) and who wants to maximise their pension allowance, ends up with an effective tax rebate of £13,500, i.e. 45% of the £30k pension allowance that they will be getting back from no longer being tapered down to the £10k minimum.

    By any measure that's extraordinarily generous, and could be the equivalent of about 15% of the tax paid on their whole income.

    All in all, not a bad budget!
    If they're putting that much in, they will probably be a 40% taxpayer in retirement.
    But as you point out, edge cases can be interesting for the (small) group of people involved.
  • ratechaser
    ratechaser Posts: 1,674 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    marlot said:
    Let's just reflect on that taper change for a moment. Anyone with an adjusted income between £210-240k (ahem...) and who wants to maximise their pension allowance, ends up with an effective tax rebate of £13,500, i.e. 45% of the £30k pension allowance that they will be getting back from no longer being tapered down to the £10k minimum.

    By any measure that's extraordinarily generous, and could be the equivalent of about 15% of the tax paid on their whole income.

    All in all, not a bad budget!
    If they're putting that much in, they will probably be a 40% taxpayer in retirement.
    But as you point out, edge cases can be interesting for the (small) group of people involved.
    Not if 'they' can help it! A couple with decent DC pots can draw a combined £100k pension income at an effective marginal tax rate of 13.33%. And I'm sure there are plenty of other tax efficiencies for those with more extravagant lifestyles.

    As for me, no interest in yachts, horses or gold digging trophy wives  :D
  • marlot
    marlot Posts: 4,972 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 11 March 2020 at 7:44PM
    ratechaser said: 
    Not if 'they' can help it! A couple with decent DC pots can draw a combined £100k pension income at an effective marginal tax rate of 13.33%....
    I think you mean an overall tax rate of 13.33%.  The marginal tax rate [ie the tax they'd pay for an additional £1 of income] for someone earning £50,001 is 40%.
    Plus, of course, they'll probably trigger the lifetime allowance if they have a big enough pot to sustain £50k a year.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.