We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Freedom of Information Act 2000 request - Cladding of a combustible nature

Greetings All!

This is what I received today to my Freedom of Information Act 2000 request on the property I consider buying - shall I be concerned?

Thanks for sharing your views in advance.

Tower Hamlets
FOI: 20xxxx85

Q: I would like to know whether the building at ADDRESS E14 ZIP has cladding issues similar to the Grenfell Tower and that could represent a high fire risk exists.

A: Freedom of Information Act 2000
I can confirm that Tower Hamlets Council holds the information you requested. However we are withholding that information since we consider that the following exemptions apply to it.

The information is exempt from disclosure under Section 38(1) of the Freedom of Information Act (FoIA). Disclosure of this information would be likely to endanger an individual (this could be the applicant, the supplier of the information or anyone else). To use this exemption we are required to undertake a public interest test. The matters which were considered in applying the public interest test are as follows:

Factors in favour of disclosure:
For an accurate picture nationally and in Tower Hamlets of the buildings affected by ACM.

Factors in favour of withholding:
Releasing this information may cause unnecessary fear or panic, risk health and safety to those living in tower blocks, and / or may result in residents living in tower blocks refusing to continue to reside there.

It is considered that the greater public interest therefore lies in not providing the information at this time. In coming to that conclusion, the public interest in providing the information has been carefully weighed against any prejudice to the public interest that might arise from withholding the information; in all the circumstances of the case, the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information.

This response therefore acts as a refusal notice under section 17 of the FoIA. Section 41 of the Freedom of Information Act sets out an exemption from the right to know where the information requested was provided to the public authority in confidence.

* The information must have been obtained by the public authority from another person, company, local authority or any other 'legal entity'.
* Disclosure of the information would give rise to an actionable breach of confidence, by the provider or any other third party.
The information you request meets the criteria for this exemption in that information given to the Council from landlords and building owners was done so in confidence and in order for the Council and building owners to work together on measures to replace any ACM cladding.

This is an absolute exemption.
We consider that the absolute exemption set out in Section 41 (Information provided in confidence) applies to the information requested.
«1

Comments

  • davidmcn
    davidmcn Posts: 23,596 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    If you're already this concerned about the property's cladding, why are you considering buying? In any event you'd need more assurance than an FOI reply from the council in order to proceed (assuming you need a mortgage).
  • foxy-stoat
    foxy-stoat Posts: 6,879 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 4 February 2020 at 5:29PM
    I would say if your needing a mortgage to purchase this property then the lender will want to know, it will be valued at £0 so move on to another property.

    Shame the DVLA cant use an absolute exemption the last time a cowboy parking firm got my details and tried to scam me out of an unregulated invoice....another thread though.
  • iamauser
    iamauser Posts: 22 Forumite
    Second Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 4 February 2020 at 5:32PM
    davidmcn wrote: »
    If you're already this concerned about the property's cladding, why are you considering buying? In any event you'd need more assurance than an FOI reply from the council in order to proceed (assuming you need a mortgage).

    thanks for the response. i got a mortgage, but my concern is not whether there is cladding, but if there is it would be at my expense to fix it. since last july noone can give a straight answer whether the building has the materials that will need to be replaced - FOI was the last resort.
  • foxy-stoat
    foxy-stoat Posts: 6,879 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    iamauser wrote: »
    thanks for the response. i got a mortgage, but my concern is not whether there is cladding, but if there is it would be at my expense. since last july noone can give a straight answer whether the building has the materials that will need to be replaced - FOI was the last resort.

    You would know if the building has cladding by looking at it.

    If Tower Hamlets owns the freehold then they would have to disclose the information when you proceed with the legals - maybe ask the current owner/occupier of the lease.
  • iamauser
    iamauser Posts: 22 Forumite
    Second Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper
    foxy-stoat wrote: »
    You would know if the building has cladding by looking at it.

    If Tower Hamlets owns the freehold then they would have to disclose the information when you proceed with the legals - maybe ask the current owner/occupier of the lease.

    well, if that was so easy to determine just by looking at it, why would the information is being withheld? and there is no information available from the freeholder/management. the answer is: "we can not disclose". and owner/occupier does not know.
  • foxy-stoat
    foxy-stoat Posts: 6,879 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    iamauser wrote: »
    well, if that was so easy to determine just by looking at it, why would the information is being withheld? and there is no information available from the freeholder/management. the answer is: "we can not disclose". and owner/occupier does not know.

    You wont be able to use a mortgage to buy this flat and your solicitor will advise against buying it as well. Move on....

    But post up the rightmove link so we can take a look.
  • iamauser
    iamauser Posts: 22 Forumite
    Second Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 4 February 2020 at 6:05PM
    foxy-stoat wrote: »
    You wont be able to use a mortgage to buy this flat and your solicitor will advise against buying it as well. Move on....

    But post up the rightmove link so we can take a look.

    different lenders have different rules - one lender asked for a cladding report, and another one was not interested.

    124613569.jpg?k=b90458feda5fd08de9b567ed9b5d79bd9f60407e5416b294c27e0e76a54ad443&o=

    15515415495c7aa52d8ba869.26948227.jpg

    15515485615c7ac0910645c3.11348435.jpg
  • Folks, any opinion?
  • davidmcn
    davidmcn Posts: 23,596 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 21 February 2020 at 1:34PM
    iamauser said:
    foxy-stoat wrote: »
    You would know if the building has cladding by looking at it.

    If Tower Hamlets owns the freehold then they would have to disclose the information when you proceed with the legals - maybe ask the current owner/occupier of the lease.

    well, if that was so easy to determine just by looking at it, why would the information is being withheld? and there is no information available from the freeholder/management. the answer is: "we can not disclose"
    Has the vendor actually made the request of the freeholders in the context of a prospective vendor requiring to exhibit a management pack to a buyer? If the freeholder is the council then there may be confusion depending on which department you're talking to - you need to be clear whether you're talking to the council wearing their landlord hat or their building control hat. The FOI response about "information given to the Council from landlords and building owners" obviously doesn't apply where the landlord is the council.

    For the meantime, you need to assume that the answer to the question "would be at my expense to fix it" is yes.
  • csgohan4
    csgohan4 Posts: 10,600 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    walk away and find something else to buy, not worth the hassle, some are mortgage prisoners because they can't sell or remortgage to others due to this issue
    "It is prudent when shopping for something important, not to limit yourself to Pound land/Estate Agents"

    G_M/ Bowlhead99 RIP
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.