County Court Defence against Gladstone+UKCPM advice needed!!!

nosferatu1001

Can you uplpad the contract here? I cannot currently, and never will, follow a link to dropbox

swooshy

Sure. First 4 pages are the contract between alleged landowner and claimant. Final page headed with "Strathclyde Pension Fund Office" is the new evidence the Claimant suggests provides landowner authority

nosferatu1001

They took out the signature block? 
As you know that is not allowed. 
there is no printed name either, so there is no proof that the contract was with 
a) a director of the claimant, as required by the acts youve seen multiple times in every thread about contracts!
b) a director of the managing company, as required....
Theres gonna be more. 

Fruitcake

I think the OP redacted the contract signatures, but I have no ide why. It does the opposite of help when posters do that.

swooshy

On the actual contract (page 4) - the signatures are blocked, and as you said there are no printed names for either party.

Fruitcake

The signatures aren't redacted in your dropbox link, so why are they blocked out in this version?

swooshy

Fruitcake said:

I think the OP redacted the contract signatures, but I have no ide why. It does the opposite of help when posters do that.

I didn't actually redact the contract signatures for the document titled "Parking Enforcement Contractual Agreement"
That's how the document was sent to me.

nosferatu1001

Fruitcake said:

The signatures aren't redacted in your dropbox link, so why are they blocked out in this version?

This suggests otherwise...so please, clear up the confusion OP!

KeithP

Why does Mr Chapman use the words "The Claimant believes..." in that Statement of Truth?
The generally accepted wording is "I believe...".
Is Mr Chapman not brave enough to confirm that he believes what he has written to be true?

If, as it is claimed, Mr Chapman is employed by UK Car Park Management Limited, isn't it strange that all his evidence exhibits are labelled with the letters GSLnn?  Gladstones Solicitors Limited?

Keep your eye on paras 22 to 26. You need to be firm in your rebuttal of that.

swooshy

Fruitcake said:

The signatures aren't redacted in your dropbox link, so why are they blocked out in this version?

Apologies. I see what you mean.
Gladstones actually sent two copies of the initial Claimant Witness Statement. In the first they redacted the signature, in the second (dropbox link version), they hadn't.