We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Stamp duty worries
succuba5
Posts: 54 Forumite
My parents bought a house in 2006 for 400,000 and put one of their names on it, mine and my two siblings as joint tenants. There's no mortgage on the property.
My husband and I are now buying a new home however we're concerned that we're now liable for a higher rate of stamp duty.
I've never lived in my parents house so it's never been a residence of mine. Would the higher rate still apply to us purchasing our new house? I've been trying to read up but I've not managed to get a straight answer!
Thank you for any help you can offer.
My husband and I are now buying a new home however we're concerned that we're now liable for a higher rate of stamp duty.
I've never lived in my parents house so it's never been a residence of mine. Would the higher rate still apply to us purchasing our new house? I've been trying to read up but I've not managed to get a straight answer!
Thank you for any help you can offer.
0
Comments
-
If you have a beneficial interest worth more than £40,000 in another property then you will have to pay an additional 3% higher rate on your next purchase.
https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/stamp-duty-land-tax-manual/sdltm09785Signature on holiday for two weeks0 -
My partner was in a similar position; she had her name taken off her mum's property before we purchased a house together.0
-
So the four of you are equal joint owners of a £4-500k property, £100-125k each.My parents bought a house in 2006 for 400,000 and put one of their names on it, mine and my two siblings as joint tenants.
What was the logic behind them doing that...?
Yes, you are.My husband and I are now buying a new home however we're concerned that we're now liable for a higher rate of stamp duty.
Makes no difference.I've never lived in my parents house so it's never been a residence of mine.
Yes, of course. You're a joint owner.Would the higher rate still apply to us purchasing our new house?0 -
We see many examples on these forums of amateur tax planning having unintended consequences. This is one such example I'm afraid.
Yes you would be liable for higher rate stamp duty as things stand. It is also worth noting that your parent's house would be at risk if you were ever to become bankrupt, given that you own a stake in it.
Do you know what your parents were trying to achieve by putting your names on the property?
It is likely that the best thing will be to get your names taken off the property. However you need to think about whether there would be any capital gains tax implications to doing this.0 -
-
My parents bought a house in 2006 for 400,000 and put one of their names on it, mine and my two siblings as joint tenants. There's no mortgage on the property.
Your parents are currently living in this property?
One parent plus three children own the property?
Thus the parent made a gift of £100,000 to each child?
You have never lived in the property and neither have your siblings?
Presumably the value of the property is now considerably greater than £400,000.
Edit - remove reference to extra SDLT - see post below.
If you gave /sold your interest to another party, there is a CGT liability to consider.
Why did your parents take this action?
Had they considered the implications of a gift with reservation of benefit?
Is the property currently owned as joint tenants or as tenants in common?0 -
-
Your parents are currently living in this property?
One parent plus three children own the property?
Thus the parent made a gift of £100,000 to each child?
You have never lived in the property and neither have your siblings?
Presumably the value of the property is now considerably greater than £400,000.
You are therefore liable to pay the higher SDLT.
If you gave /sold your interest to another party, there is a CGT liability to consider.
Why did your parents take this action?
Had they considered the implications of a gift with reservation of benefit?
Is the property currently owned as joint tenants or as tenants in common?
]Your parents are currently living in this property? Yes
One parent plus three children own the property? Yes
Thus the parent made a gift of £100,000 to each child? I guess so yes
You have never lived in the property and neither have your siblings? No
Presumably the value of the property is now considerably greater than £400,000. I think 500,000
You are therefore liable to pay the higher SDLT.
If you gave /sold your interest to another party, there is a CGT liability to consider.
Why did your parents take this action? They wanted us to each have a share of the house
Had they considered the implications of a gift with reservation of benefit? I don't know what that terminology means but higher rate stamp duty didn't exist when they did this
Is the property currently owned as joint tenants or as tenants in common? It's joint tenants0 -
OP you really need to answer scottishblondie's question because it will make all the difference in terms of your SDLT liability.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
