We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Service charge refund sent to someone else

2»

Comments

  • Tiglet2
    Tiglet2 Posts: 2,716 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Eddddy I wouldn't suggest the seller to approach the buyer directly, no. Any dialogue should be between the sellers and buyers solicitors.

    The seller's solicitor would write to the buyer's solicitor with the evidence to prove that the buyer has a credit on his service charge account to which he was not entitled. This is assuming that the seller's solicitor did not make apportionments for the service charges on completion, or at least not to the end of the accounting period.

    The buyer's solicitor would then contact the buyer setting out evidence of the overpayment. The buyer could ignore the letter because, as stated before, the retention of £300 is the only part held as part of the contract. This is why I said that if the buyer ignores the letter (which he could do), it would then be down to the seller to take the matter further, i.e. proving that his solicitor was negligent in not apportioning correctly on completion or by taking the buyer to the small claims court to claim back the overpayment.

    Yes, I agree it's a long shot, but it isn't necessarily case closed because it wasn't in the contract, and is certainly worth making an effort to pursue rather than just writing it off.

    I am a paralegal conveyancing assistant working directly with a solicitor at a conveyancing law firm.
  • eddddy
    eddddy Posts: 18,509 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    As a paralegal, you seem very confused about how the law works.

    For example:
    Tiglet2 wrote: »
    ...or by taking the buyer to the small claims court to claim back the overpayment

    You can't take somebody to court because you ask them for a gift, and they refuse to give you a gift.

    You need a legal basis for winning a court claim - such as breach of contract.



    As for the solicitor writing a letter - yes, many solicitors will write 'nasty letters' to people demanding money, when there is no legal basis for the demand. The intention is to fool people into paying.

    I guess that's a valid option to mention in this thread, but it's probably important that you mention that it's just a 'dirty trick', which may or may not work.
  • Thanks for the further info. I emailed m6 solicitor again yesterday asking them again what is happening. All the other home owners private owners in the block got a credit to their account or a bank transfer from l n q. Everyone had over paid as it was the first year they managed the building. Yes you are correct with your math. We have overpaid by £1300 and have final statements from the other owners as l n q would not send me one having sold. My solicitor made us pay nearly £1600 over 3 months to l n q to complete. I’m just at the end of my tether with this. I will leave my solicitor again for another week then call them. I can prove the statement charge for 2018 to 2019 and have my statement to show payments. I didn’t want to pay them all that money but they refused to complete with outstanding debt on the estimated service charge.
    So the new buyer got my refund in September and will not have to pay service charges for 18 months?! How can this be legal and fair??
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.