We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Switching BTL to SPV

2

Comments

  • pavsid
    pavsid Posts: 18 Forumite
    BoGoF wrote: »
    In Example 2 you are forgetting the Corporation Tax on the rental income. And you can't take 8k extra dividends if the net profit is only 5k say ( slightly more complicated than that I know).

    You really need to run calculations based on the taxable rental profit figure.

    The extra £8k would come from my company in dividends, nothing to do with the BTL or SPV.

    I'm basically saying that I could give myself a pay rise, but still be in the lower tax bracket.

    Maybe that's where the confusion is.
  • BoGoF
    BoGoF Posts: 7,098 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I see what you are saying now. My point still stands that the 8k rent received currently is not 8k taxable is it? If it's only 4k say then you can pay yourself 4k more dividends.

    And you are fixating on your own personal tax position and not the overall picture. The SPV will still need to pay tax on the rental income, pay the expenses.
  • pavsid
    pavsid Posts: 18 Forumite
    BoGoF wrote: »
    I see what you are saying now. My point still stands that the 8k rent received currently is not 8k taxable is it? If it's only 4k say then you can pay yourself 4k more dividends.

    And you are fixating on your own personal tax position and not the overall picture. The SPV will still need to pay tax on the rental income, pay the expenses.

    My point is that I currently pay the £8k rent back to the mortgage as repayment + overpayments. So I see nothing of it. The tax on the rent/profit doesn't concern me really.

    Freeing up the £8k means I can do more and enjoy it more. Yes, the objective was my personal position, not necessarily with regards to tax, but with real net income "in my back pocket".

    That being said, all these SPV costs and taxes are adding up, and if I added them to the SPV mortgage loan, then the total repayable in additional interest over the course of the mortgage term doesn't make it worth it. I might be better off just paying myself more dividends and taking the hit with the higher tax rate.

    Ah well, was worth a try, thanks for all your help.

    If i'm ever in a position to acquire another BTL, I will do it through an SPV from the beginning for sure!!!
  • BoGoF
    BoGoF Posts: 7,098 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Or you just sell the BTL!

    What is it yielding?
  • pavsid
    pavsid Posts: 18 Forumite
    BoGoF wrote: »
    Or you just sell the BTL!

    What is it yielding?

    6.2% gross. But as I say, I'm on repayment and make overpayments, so that one day it will boost my pension.
  • BoGoF
    BoGoF Posts: 7,098 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Not great tbh.....you could match that in a SIPP (meaning you would extend your basic rate band and pay yourself more divs) or S & S ISA
  • silvercar
    silvercar Posts: 49,930 Ambassador
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Academoney Grad Name Dropper
    6.2% gross isn't bad when there is potential for capital growth.
    I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.
  • pavsid
    pavsid Posts: 18 Forumite
    BoGoF wrote: »
    Not great tbh.....you could match that in a SIPP (meaning you would extend your basic rate band and pay yourself more divs) or S & S ISA
    silvercar wrote: »
    6.2% gross isn't bad when there is potential for capital growth.

    This is maybe where I fail to understand rental yields - that 6.2% is based on yearly rental income divided by purchase price....which doesn't make much sense to me, because I didn't pay the full purchase price.

    My only costs really have been the deposit and fees when purchasing, and the monthly interest on the mortgage plus maintenance etc.

    So to me, a better way of looking at it would be yearly rental income, less interest and costs, divided by initial outlay on purchase (deposit + fees), which is more like 40% per year.

    Correct me if i'm wrong!
  • BoGoF
    BoGoF Posts: 7,098 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    So how much equity do you know have in the property.....must be some if you have a potential CGT liability.
  • pavsid
    pavsid Posts: 18 Forumite
    BoGoF wrote: »
    So how much equity do you know have in the property.....must be some if you have a potential CGT liability.

    Yeah quite a bit, based on current market value it's 55% LTV. The property has increased about 25% in value since buying it 8yrs ago.

    You got other ideas?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.