Smart parking popla appeal help re keeper liability

Coupon-mad

You have 'BPS' CoP early on, instead of BPA.

Remove all this, which is unnecessary as all the refs get put in boxes on the POPLA page:

Re: Parking Charge Reference number XXXXX, Vehicle registration XXXXX, Appeal number XXXXXXX

I am the registered keeper of the above vehicle and have received the above demand from Smart Parking. My appeal to Smart Parking was notified as rejected on the XXXXX and they gave me POPLA code XXXXX to quote for appeal to yourselves.

And the 2nd point should be the first, it is your winning point! Add to it that
the operator cannot hold a registered keeper liable with non-POFA Notice to Keepers, which have nothing from the POFA paragraph 9 within the document whatsoever. This is the only version NTK that Smart Parking have ever used and they have never been able to hold a registered keeper liable under the law, so the PCN was not properly given and POPLA must allow the appeal.

Leolion01

Thank you very much.

To be clear, you would include the entirety of this text, "the operator cannot hold a registered keeper liable with non-POFA Notice to Keepers, which have nothing from the POFA paragraph 9 within the document whatsoever. This is the only version NTK that Smart Parking have ever used and they have never been able to hold a registered keeper liable under the law, so the PCN was not properly given and POPLA must allow the appeal" ?

Coupon-mad

Absolutely yes, I wrote it to mimic POPLA's own words, which usually helps them come to the right conclusion!