Active funds outperform trackers

Thrugelmir

ivormonee wrote: »

It would indicate clearly that they are not there to "provide a service" but rather to make as much money as possible for themselves and, to some degree, their shareholders.

Welcome to the real world of global capitalism.

torrence

Were those superior gains after the fees? Active funds fees are higher. After fees trackers have better long term performance.

bowlhead99

torrence wrote: »

Were those superior gains after the fees? Active funds fees are higher. After fees trackers have better long term performance.

Did you read the thread?

Linton wrote: »

Performance figures take fund charges into account, they are based on the actual returns an investor would see.

TBC15

torrence wrote: »

Were those superior gains after the fees? Active funds fees are higher. After fees trackers have better long term performance.

Yes,Yes,No

Thrugelmir

torrence wrote: »

Were those superior gains after the fees? Active funds fees are higher. After fees trackers have better long term performance.

Which trackers are you referring too?