We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a Merry Christmas. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!
IR35 changes April 2020
stphnstevey
Posts: 3,227 Forumite
in Cutting tax
Just wondered if anyone has been thinking about what they might do in April 2020, if anything without proper guidance?
0
Comments
-
What guidance are you looking for? The rules as to to in or out haven't changed, just who picks up the liability for any unpaid employment taxes.
If you're unsure as to the status of a role, you could try this link;
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/check-employment-status-for-tax
It's vastly more comprehensive than the last one.0 -
I wouldn't bother with CEST - it's not fit for purpose and, despite what they say, HMRC don't stand by the results.
I'm not sure what you mean about "proper guidance" - the rules are highly likely to be implemented as they are in the draft leglislation so if you're still hoping they'll be changed and we'll all get new guidance I think you should start planning now based the current wording.
What advice are you looking for?0 -
3 months away and there is not definitive guidance. Politicians suggesting review during election promises. Many still expecting changes. Agencies some still not even aware, let alone prepared. Some companies boycotting all freelancers (HSBC, GSK etc) so don't fall foul of tax responsibilities
So YES, complete MESS, what more should expect from government?0 -
I'm going perm.
It's not worth it, contractors don't get sick pay, annual leave pay, pension, employment rights etc.
Also, if you go umbrella solution with the same client you will be proving to HMRC that you're always been inside IR35 and may have to pay back taxes which they are currently doing with the loan charge.0 -
presumably you are not going perm with one of your clients? If yes then same principle you mention applies anywayCanadianDream wrote: »I'm going perm.
It's not worth it, contractors don't get sick pay, annual leave pay, pension, employment rights etc.
Also, if you go umbrella solution with the same client you will be proving to HMRC that you're always been inside IR35 and may have to pay back taxes which they are currently doing with the loan charge.0 -
i garree HMRC has sent a letter to all GSK contractors, but as far as oi know GSK itself is not boycotting existing contractors as we have quite a few of themstphnstevey wrote: »3 months away and there is not definitive guidance. Politicians suggesting review during election promises. Many still expecting changes. Agencies some still not even aware, let alone prepared. Some companies boycotting all freelancers (HSBC, GSK etc) so don't fall foul of tax responsibilities
So YES, complete MESS, what more should expect from government?0 -
i garree HMRC has sent a letter to all GSK contractors, but as far as oi know GSK itself is not boycotting existing contractors as we have quite a few of them
https://www.personneltoday.com/hr/barclays-and-others-urge-contractors-to-go-paye/0 -
I forgot to mention that going perm at current client also applies although I wonder if it would apply if they offered a different position?
It's a shame really, I currently work for a great company.0 -
which, as i said, relates that GSK has not yet decided one way or the other. That said, I know of some GSK contractors who have got a panic on and are looking to quit contracting as a result.stphnstevey wrote: »
As far as GB Plc is concerned, I say that will be a very good outcome, as the expenses some of them were claiming were a perfect example of why a Ltd can be tax "efficient" in the right circumstances0 -
As far as GB Plc is concerned, I say that will be a very good outcome, as the expenses some of them were claiming were a perfect example of why a Ltd can be tax "efficient" in the right circumstances
GB plc will suffer badly from this. The PAYE roles are offering far less by way of compensation so rather than getting say 35% of £120k HMRC will receive say 38% of £75k. A bigger slice of a smaller pie, and that's before the accountants, B&Bs, restaurants etc which will all lose out are included.
This is a misguided policy and will see the tax take reduce, but all we'll hear is what a success it's been when PAYE/NIC receipts are up (i.e. we won't hear that Corporation Tax, VAT, Dividend Tax receipts are all down).
Plus, a lot of the work is now being off-shored.
The policy is a disaster and a simple, new off-payroll tax would have yielded more money without destroying the market.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.7K Spending & Discounts
- 246K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 259.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards