We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Suing builder confusion

amadf
Posts: 5 Forumite
Hi appreciate any help!
Im suing a builder but Im not sure how to calculate the costs of the defects, theres many issues like damp roof and leakage. How do I go about calculating the costs of repairs? Do I have to get a quote from another builder to fix it and add those to the amount im suing the builder for? or do i first get it repaired and then sue for the costs?
the defects are very obvious (such as water dropping from the ceiling)
and what about cosmetic defects, for example, i told the builder to use a certain type of brick for a number of rows, and he did not do this (in breach of contract), do i just sue for costs that i think is reasonable??
Im suing a builder but Im not sure how to calculate the costs of the defects, theres many issues like damp roof and leakage. How do I go about calculating the costs of repairs? Do I have to get a quote from another builder to fix it and add those to the amount im suing the builder for? or do i first get it repaired and then sue for the costs?
the defects are very obvious (such as water dropping from the ceiling)
and what about cosmetic defects, for example, i told the builder to use a certain type of brick for a number of rows, and he did not do this (in breach of contract), do i just sue for costs that i think is reasonable??
0
Comments
-
Normally you need to get three quotes from other competent contractors to repair the work, then take the average of these quotes. If some of the damage needs fixing immediately to avoid further damage, you should get the work done and sue for the cost of the repair, but be prepared to have to explain why the work couldn't wait until after the court case to be done. You should try to limit the amount of work done prior to the case to the bare minimum - so essential/emergency repairs only.
With cosmetic defects, the builder may argue that your loss is much less that the cost to fix the problem, so you might have to settle for less, but I would get three quotes to fix the problem (as above), and see what the judge decides. Did you give the builder a written specification of the types of bricks to use for a number of rows? If you told him verbally, he could just say "The customer never specified anything to me". The judge will have to consider who they believe - so what evidence do you have that you specified the work to the builder?The comments I post are my personal opinion. While I try to check everything is correct before posting, I can and do make mistakes, so always try to check official information sources before relying on my posts.0 -
Thanks tacpot
the entire building has already been constructed so it cant be fixed and the contract mentions the number of rows, the builder did less rows than was specified in the contract, ill have to come up with a reasonable price of the irreparable defects on my own?0 -
Thanks tacpot
the entire building has already been constructed so it cant be fixed and the contract mentions the number of rows, the builder did less rows than was specified in the contract, ill have to come up with a reasonable price of the irreparable defects on my own?
You can't just invent figures. Get a builder to give an estimate if you can't get a firm figure. You need some sort of evidence.0 -
how do i get a builder to give me an estimate for a cosmetic defect which cant be repaired
If you are going to leave it "as is" then claim the difference between what it did cost and what you were quoted for. You should be able to come up with a rough figure. Things like fewer bricks, quicker build time etc are quantifiable to some degree.0 -
If this is going to court then I strongly recommend that you seek the advice of a chartered architect or building surveyor, who can advise on scope of work and costs with a high degree of confidence.Health Warning: I am happy to occasionally comment on building matters on the forum. However it is simply not possible to give comprehensive professional technical advice on an internet forum. Any comments made are therefore only of a general nature to point you in what is hopefully the right direction.0
-
i did a bit of research on companies house and the builders Ltd company which im suing only has 1k on its micro entity balance sheet, is this the maximum i will be able to claim before he dissolves the company? it appears he may not be declaring the income especially since i paid him alot of money0
-
i did a bit of research on companies house and the builders Ltd company which im suing only has 1k on its micro entity balance sheet, is this the maximum i will be able to claim before he dissolves the company?0
-
i did a bit of research on companies house and the builders Ltd company which im suing only has 1k on its micro entity balance sheet, is this the maximum i will be able to claim before he dissolves the company? it appears he may not be declaring the income especially since i paid him alot of money
You paid cash?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.1K Spending & Discounts
- 243K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.4K Life & Family
- 255.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards