Redundancy - what should I be doing about this?

I'm being made redundant in the next few days as my job is being transferred to another site within the business.
No issues with that from a personal perspective. I haven't liked the job for quite a while.
Generous redundancy as I have very long service and it is generously enhanced.
I have received a settlement agreement and was ready to sign.
However, in the last couple of weeks, I've found out that the company has immediately given my job to someone else, who isn't even a permanent employee.
This person has worked for my site on an interim basis for quite a few years at a premium rate but works from home.
I've followed the company redundancy policy and have raised a grievance purely because I don't believe they have done the right thing. Eventually the who site is closing but I had the potential to earn at least another year's wages.
My argument is purely financial, not emotional.
In the grievance hearing which was conducted by someone who doesn't work from either site, I was questioned as to whether I really wanted to work from the other site. I don't but this interim person won't either. They will work from home.
They also earn over twice as much as me and it does specifically say in the redundancy policy that the financial aspect will be a major deciding factor.
I was lucky enough to be able to speak to an employment solicitor who didn't seem to doubt at all that I had a case but as a family member of a good friend, told me that her firm would be much too expensive to pursue it.
I don't think I've got legal cover elsewhere but I do have it with my union.
I'm waiting for a reply on the grievance and I do have an idea of what is likely to be said and how to respond to it.
I also haven't signed the settlement agreement as advised by the solicitor. I had originally contacted her for this reason.
I think I've covered everything there!
Has anyone got any helpful advice or suggestions?
If it looks too difficult and stressful, I would be fairly happy to take the money and run but I feel I am letting them get away with something really wrong.


Thanks
«1

Replies

  • Takeaway_AddictTakeaway_Addict Forumite
    6.5K Posts
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts
    Forumite
    Are they a contractor? If so I think that will nullify your arguments.
    Don't trust a forum for advice. Get proper paid advice. Any advice given should always be checked
  • Thank you.
    In what way?
    I'm just trying to get some advice on whether it is worth pursuing.
  • Takeaway_AddictTakeaway_Addict Forumite
    6.5K Posts
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts
    Forumite
    Thank you.
    In what way?
    I'm just trying to get some advice on whether it is worth pursuing.

    If they are a contractor they are not employed, no holiday pay, sick pay etc, no notice. It maybe the case they thought your job was gone so processed as they did with you but then realised there was a need but they didn't want the restrictions that come with yourself so used someone self employed.

    You're in a union though so best to talk to them about it.
    Don't trust a forum for advice. Get proper paid advice. Any advice given should always be checked
  • DonnySaverDonnySaver Forumite
    559 Posts
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite
    I don't think I've got legal cover elsewhere but I do have it with my union.


    Do you have legal cover on your home insurance policy? Some policies will cover you for situations such as this. Also, some 'packaged' bank accounts do the same.
  • I will scour everything I've got tonight to find legal cover but I have a leasehold property, so only have contents insurance personally, which tends to not be so generous with freebies.


    With regards to the job, I think they have always known they would need someone to cover but for some reason have told me the job is no longer required but have handed it over to someone else.


    I don't want to go into all the details but it would have been practical to have employed me for another year and if they had done that, I wouldn't have an issue with it.
  • It's pretty obvious that the job isn't the same job. The same job doesn't just mean the same role, it also means the same terms. The terms are not the same.

    Your union may not be willing to represent you or offer any advice, as you say you've gone to another solicitor with the settlement agreement, and so it is now that solicitors job to advise you. Unions will not get involved if you have sought representation elsewhere. You can't not tell them that, as you clearly have a settlement agreement in the offing.

    You don't like the job. You have a generous redundancy package and its enhanced. Why the hell would you risk that? At the end of this year you could end up not redundant and with nothing. The minute you walk into a suitable alternative role, which you are saying this would be for you, your redundancy is gone. A year from now they could put you somewhere else and you're screwed. Be careful what you wish for.
  • The solicitor I spoke to was a friend and it was not official and I will not be using this firm to pursue anything other than the settlement agreement which will be paid for by the company I work for. Are you saying I should have taken the settlement agreement to my union? I've not heard of anyone else doing that.
    Nobody knows that I've received this advice, so not sure how they could refuse to represent me based on something they don't know about.
    It was a conversation, not a any sort of official action.
  • Scorpio33Scorpio33 Forumite
    712 Posts
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite
    The question you have always have to ask yourself is: What outcome do you want?

    They clearly don't want the job as it stands, in the current location, so that option is not available. Legally, that job doesn't exist, as its not in that location.

    If you can define what outcome you want, perhaps your employer will be amenable to suggestions or others here could give you more specific advice.
  • The solicitor I spoke to was a friend and it was not official and I will not be using this firm to pursue anything other than the settlement agreement which will be paid for by the company I work for. Are you saying I should have taken the settlement agreement to my union? I've not heard of anyone else doing that.
    Nobody knows that I've received this advice, so not sure how they could refuse to represent me based on something they don't know about.
    It was a conversation, not a any sort of official action.
    Unions routinely sign off on settlements and are one of the legally recognised bodies to do so. The fact that you haven’t heard about that doesn’t change the facts - you have taken legal advice on the redundancy from elsewhere, and that isn’t really something you can hide, as it will be their first question. You MUST have legal advice on a settlement agreement, you were about to sign, so they are going to ask who gave you that advice. To be legally binding it must be countersigned by your legal advisor and that isn’t them.
  • Sorry, I'm getting confused now.
    My settlement agreement will be countersigned by the solicitor when appropriate with legal advice relating to that subject and that subject only.
    The issue I am posting about has not really 'gone' officially to anyone. It has been raised by myself directly to the company.


    To be clear again, I have questioned the decision but if they come back with an acceptable answer, I will not pursue it further.


    I know what I want the outcome to be but because the grievance has been raised and the person dealing with it has had to go away and find out quite a lot of things, we haven't really got that far yet.
This discussion has been closed.
Latest MSE News and Guides

Did you know there's an MSE app?

It's free & available on iOS & Android

MSE App

Regifting: good idea or not?

Add your two cents to the discussion

MSE Forum

Energy Price Guarantee calculator

How much you'll likely pay from April

MSE Tools