LOC from DCB Legal - appeal rejected

damascas

The exact response has been sent.

damascas

I got a response to this. It was terse. See below.

"We acknowledge your email, however our position remains the same."

beamerguy wrote: »

Is that right, the only industry standards is between themselves and it is not law.

Dear DCB Legal,

The only industry standards which you refer to, is selected by a minority of companies like yours in an attempt to circumvent the law of POFA2012, the Supreme court, the courts own ruling of double recovery and The Consumer Rights Act 2015

The Supreme court in 198. ''...The charge has to be and is set at a level which enables the managers to recover the costs of operating the scheme

Your claim is classed as Abuse of Process as currently being dictated by the courts. If you are not aware of this, I will be happy to provide you with full details.

Therefore, I again ask for your authority to apply a further £60, failing which I will provide the court with information about Abuse of process and request your claim is struck out.
I will also ask the court what makes you believe that in this unregulated industry, you think there is an "industry standard" which in reality can be considered as a cartel operating

I therefore must advise you that in the event of your claim being struck out, the court will be presented with my costs

Coupon-mad

I am sure their position remains the same but so what? We know their client CANNOT lawfully add £60 and you now why if you read CEC16's thread.