We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
cifas marker category 4, help!
Options
Comments
-
louisandrei wrote: »Hi! What is your purpose for posting this? It's just a half of the story, I will write the full story later
I posted it as it could help other people who come here in the same situation.0 -
I'm also a little puzzled why you would involve a second person.0
-
If they feel the broker is the one in the wrong, they will take action against the broker and the CIFAS marker should be removed from your file.
You won't get anywhere by bleating on here about how unfair it is. You've been told what to do - go to the FOS."Facism arrives as your friend. It will restore your honour, make you feel proud, protect your house, give you a job, clean up the neighbourhood, remind you of how great you once were, clear out the venal and the corrupt, remove anything you feel is unlike you... [it] doesn't walk in saying, "our programme means militias, mass imprisonments, transportations, war and persecution."0 -
louisandrei wrote: »To make the things simple. The fact is I didn't tell, sign, check or know the information he provided to the lender!
Of course you didn't, you allowed a third party to liaise with the broker on your behalf. If you wanted to oversee the process you should have done what most people do and deal with it yourself. You decided, for whatever reason, to involve a third party in the process and as a result, lost almost all control over it.I only know everything few months after another application was declined.
See above.It’s is very dangerous for you to believe a signature is not important. If a broker filled in false information without your knowledge, this could cause significant inconsistency in your future application.
It has become absolutely normal for contracts to be signed "digitally" and even then, signatures are really only there to cover people's rear ends in case something goes wrong. And if you gave permission for the third party to deal with this, what's to say they didn't sign something or verbally agree to it over the phone?
It goes back to what I said at the beginning. Offloading this to a third party has taken all control out of your hands and when that happens you can't really complain that you didn't have any involvement. That's what you get when you do something like that.0 -
You're only saying that because you're not getting the answers you want to hear.louisandrei wrote: »I wouldn’t explain anything anymore. I don’t think I can get helpful things in here
You have been told several times what your next step is. Do it."Facism arrives as your friend. It will restore your honour, make you feel proud, protect your house, give you a job, clean up the neighbourhood, remind you of how great you once were, clear out the venal and the corrupt, remove anything you feel is unlike you... [it] doesn't walk in saying, "our programme means militias, mass imprisonments, transportations, war and persecution."0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards