Uc and light touch regime

I may need to apply for uc with my partner, she takes home 1630 per month, if we applied for uc woukd we be put into two claiment commitment groups as she will be work 37 hours a week and I wouldn't be working, or would we both be put in the light touch regime and have to do the two calls on week one and week 2,
«1

Comments

  • calcotti
    calcotti Posts: 15,696 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    You would both be in light touch regime
    https://www.uceplus.co.uk/light-touch-regime.html
    This would exclude you from work search and work availability requirements. You could still be subject to work related activity.

    However, from your other post, you would be claiming with a Fit Note so all of this could be irrelevant as you may not be in the all work search group anyway.
    Information I post is for England unless otherwise stated. Some rules may be different in other parts of UK.
  • Cam05
    Cam05 Posts: 28 Forumite
    10 Posts
    What is work related activities
    Would my wife be put in no work group as she works 37 hours, surely they can't make her look for more work
    Even without claiming esa if I had fit notes I might be out in no work related group anyway
  • NedS
    NedS Posts: 4,295 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Your partner would be in "no work related requirements - working enough" due to her earnings being above her CET and you would be placed in light touch, again due to household earnings above the AET. Neither of you would be required to attend routine appointments at the jobcentre or look for work/undertake any work related activity (under the current policy).
  • calcotti
    calcotti Posts: 15,696 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 8 December 2019 at 5:54PM
    NedS wrote: »
    Your partner would be in "no work related requirements - working enough" due to her earnings being above her CET and you would be placed in light touch, again due to household earnings above the AET. Neither of you would be required to attend routine appointments at the jobcentre or look for work/undertake any work related activity (under the current policy).
    I thought that while below the CET there could be a requirement to do work related activity (but not work search or meet the work availability requirements).
    http://data.parliament.uk/DepositedPapers/Files/DEP2019-0980/2._Administrative_and_Conditionality_Earnings_Thresholds_v3.0.pdf
    http://data.parliament.uk/DepositedPapers/Files/DEP2019-0980/71._Labour_Market_regimes_v11.0.pdf

    Seems to me this is a very confusing part of UC!
    Information I post is for England unless otherwise stated. Some rules may be different in other parts of UK.
  • Cam05
    Cam05 Posts: 28 Forumite
    10 Posts
    Hopefully there is someone on the forum who has been in this situation, it's so confusing
  • Cam05
    Cam05 Posts: 28 Forumite
    10 Posts
    Hopefully there is someone on the forum who has been in this situation, it's so confusing
  • huckster
    huckster Posts: 5,158 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 8 December 2019 at 6:49PM
    Wife would be in Working enough- no work related requirement.

    You would be in the Light touch- out of work group.

    Light touch out of work means that you won't have a work search claimant commitment.

    Any children ? If so, age of youngest child ?

    If you have no children, then as a couple you would not be meeting the conditionality earnings threshold. While this remains the case, although you would not be seeing a Work Coach in the Job Centre regularly to review work searches, you may be required to attend the Job Centre at some stage to discuss your situation.
    The comments I post are personal opinion. Always refer to official information sources before relying on internet forums. If you have a problem with any organisation, enter into their official complaints process at the earliest opportunity, as sometimes complaints have to be started within a certain time frame.
  • Alice_Holt
    Alice_Holt Posts: 6,094 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    huckster wrote: »
    Any children ? If so, age of youngest child ?

    See https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/76581908#Comment_76581908
    Alice Holt Forest situated some 4 miles south of Farnham forms the most northerly gateway to the South Downs National Park.
  • Cam05
    Cam05 Posts: 28 Forumite
    10 Posts
    We have one child age 12,
    So me and my wife would be in different groups if we went on uc
  • huckster
    huckster Posts: 5,158 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Ok, so with a child of 12, then the CET is worked out based on 25 hours a week national minimum wage, the wifes current earnings may be just enough for both to be in Working enough group ?

    When the child turns 13, CET will be based on 35 hours per week.
    The comments I post are personal opinion. Always refer to official information sources before relying on internet forums. If you have a problem with any organisation, enter into their official complaints process at the earliest opportunity, as sometimes complaints have to be started within a certain time frame.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453K Spending & Discounts
  • 242.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.4K Life & Family
  • 255.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.