We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Bathroom Taps Refund 'dispute'
Comments
-
Maybe these are not hard water.buyershould research I could return taps to Screwfix if a little rust is a inconvenience.0
-
Maybe these are not hard water. buyershould research I could return taps to Screwfix if a little rust is a inconvenience.
Whether the OP lives in a hard or soft water area doesn't matter one bit as the taps are obviously rusting/pitting on the outside.
Anyway, it's not down to it being an inconvenience, simply that goods are expected to last a reasonable time without a defect occurring and I don't think any sensible person would consider that 6 months or less for a tap costing £125 is anywhere near to a reasonable time.
The retailer obviously agrees or why would they have offered a refund?0 -
Doesn't consumer legislation make the seller liable for all costs in providing a resolution? So the seller should also cover the cost of removing the faulty taps and refitting replacements?0
-
Theres no entitlement to betterment (unless its impossible to restore your position without it being a byproduct) but at the same time, you shouldn't be worse off due to a breach by the other party.
You could technically reject the whole order (not just those that don't conform) but you might find if you try that, the company will be less accommodating and may claim their previous offer was goodwill only (leaving you to prove the taps are inherently faulty).You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride0 -
Doesn't consumer legislation make the seller liable for all costs in providing a resolution? So the seller should also cover the cost of removing the faulty taps and refitting replacements?
Just for repair or replacement. Although it would still be open for them to claim damages when they opt for a refund, for any losses caused by the breach.You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 246.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.2K Life & Family
- 260.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards