We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Mortgage conditional on DPC

Hi all

Has this happened to anyone? Looking for some advice.

We're buying a house, valuation came back suggesting a timber specialist check. We did that and they recommended installing a DPC. Initially, the bank said they would be happy lend £485 instead of £490 since we didn't want to do any work to the property before moving in. Two days later they said this was a mistake and we need to get the work done before we get an offer.

Our broker has suggested the estate agent write a letter guaranteeing the work will be carried out between exchange and completion and that this may be accepted by the lender.

Our question is, has anyone else gone through that process? Did it work? What should the letter say? Our broker isn't being very helpful in contributing to the content of the letter so we're going to have to write it ourselves.

Any advice or suggestions?

Cheers
Jake

Comments

  • JakeH wrote: »
    Our broker has suggested the estate agent write a letter guaranteeing the work will be carried out between exchange and completion and that this may be accepted by the lender.

    What an absolute useless suggestion. Why would a lender take the word of someone who doesnt own the property?

    If work is to be done between exchange and completion then it is agreed through solicitors as an undertaking. Even then the lender is not going to be happy to do it.

    Even if you found a way to get this done after exchange and before completion, If it hasn't been done to an acceptable standard then the lender may not release the funds. Silly risk to take as the completion date becomes closer and closer and you have no way to pay for the house.

    If you really want to buy the house just try a new lender. Last time I went through this and got it on the 3rd lender. First one declined it on damp, 2nd one had full retention, 3rd one offered no issues
  • Davesnave
    Davesnave Posts: 34,741 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    You haven't told us what sort of house it is and why it needs a DPC.


    There are plenty of firms out there willing to give older houses a 'free' inspection followed by a full chemical 'solution' to problems of damp, but the problems are usually only there because someone else has done something inappropriate in the past. They often return after the guarantee runs out.

    Be sure you know what you're getting into, that's all.
  • Thanks, both. It's a mid-1800s Victorian terrace. The house is structurally sound, just very unloved and needs modernising. The timber specialist suggested injecting in a DPC but there isn't any sign of serious damp problems anywhere in the property.
  • if its mid 1800s i would be very very careful in bringing chemicals in to the mix. Its stood for nearly 200 years so far without them. Find out why its damp and fix the source.

    If it doesnt appear damp and there are no obvious signs around the hosue I would maybe just find a new lender and deal with it if it is a problem once you are in. Maybe it will present itself over the winter
  • FreeBear
    FreeBear Posts: 18,371 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Victorian era property - Quite possible they used slate or a course of engineering bricks as a DPC. Neither will "fail" unless physically damaged or bridged by external soil levels. You've had the free survey from a specialist [STRIKE]surveyor[/STRIKE] salesman, now go and find yourself a proper surveyor with experience of Victorian buildings (steer clear of any with links to the PCA). You will have to pay for the survey, and I'll bet that it comes back saying "no chemical treatments required".
    Any language construct that forces such insanity in this case should be abandoned without regrets. –
    Erik Aronesty, 2014

    Treasure the moments that you have. Savour them for as long as you can for they will never come back again.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.