We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Selling to a limited company (not mine)

peterhjohnson
Posts: 477 Forumite

My buyer is:
* Cash buyer
* Cash seen by EA
* A builder
* A limited company
We haven't exchanged yet and I'm wondering if my solicitor should be doing anything different because this isn't a common sort of buyer? Should he be seeking a Personal Guarantee from the company directors? It's quite easy for a limited company to go bust compared to a private individual
* Cash buyer
* Cash seen by EA
* A builder
* A limited company
We haven't exchanged yet and I'm wondering if my solicitor should be doing anything different because this isn't a common sort of buyer? Should he be seeking a Personal Guarantee from the company directors? It's quite easy for a limited company to go bust compared to a private individual
(My username is not related to my real name)
0
Comments
-
Making sure you get the full 10% Deposit on exchange - you don't need the personal guarantee as if they fail to complete you get the deposit.0
-
It wouldn't be normal to be concerned about the covenant of your buyer. Anybody can pull out before exchange with no penalty, if they do so after exchange you've got their deposit anyway, would be quite rare for you to suffer losses beyond that.0
-
peterhjohnson wrote: »My buyer is:
* Cash buyer
* Cash seen by EA
* A builder
* A limited company
We haven't exchanged yet and I'm wondering if my solicitor should be doing anything different because this isn't a common sort of buyer? Should he be seeking a Personal Guarantee from the company directors? It's quite easy for a limited company to go bust compared to a private individual
Where on earth did you hear that??!!0 -
Why would you need personal guarantee, when you have the deposit on exchange, plus potential claim for non-completion, which is all free money. It's not like you will have to give up your home, without receiving full payment first.0
-
It wouldn't be normal to be concerned about the covenant of your buyer. Anybody can pull out before exchange with no penalty, if they do so after exchange you've got their deposit anyway, would be quite rare for you to suffer losses beyond that.
If something goes wrong after exchange, my onward chain will likely collapse :-( The deposit will have been paid on to my buyer and so on along the chain? It would be a great "consolation prize" to be the one that walks away with this deposit money but am I likely to be that lucky?(My username is not related to my real name)0 -
Something can always go wrong. the buyer is going to be very sure before exchanging because they wont want to lose their deposit.0
-
peterhjohnson wrote: »If something goes wrong after exchange, my onward chain will likely collapse :-( The deposit will have been paid on to my buyer and so on along the chain? It would be a great "consolation prize" to be the one that walks away with this deposit money but am I likely to be that lucky?
Ok, but like I said it wouldn't be normal to start checking how creditworthy an individual buyer was (beyond whatever the EA has done to see how proceedable they are), so I'm not sure of the logic behind your query. What advice has your solicitor offered on this point?0 -
Where on earth did you hear that??!!
From my accountant and an insolvency practitioner when I was a director a of a limited company myself. When a Ltd Co goes bust, the shareholders and Directors are not automatically liable for the debts. There is some legislation that can be used to make them liable - but looking at actual cases, you have to behave outrageously to be caught. This is precisely why Banks tend to demand Personal Guarantees from Directors wanting a company overdraft.(My username is not related to my real name)0 -
The most pointless thread on the forum?I'm wondering if my solicitor should be doing anything different0
-
Where on earth did you hear that??!!
The clue is in "Limited liability". Limited companies exist so that businesses can take risks with producing new products that might or might not be sucessful without putting their own money at risk.
However, the Ltd company system has been set up with safeguards, as a Ltd company have to make certain aspects of their financial health and addresses of directors etc. public. Sole traders do not have to do this.
I suggest the OP should do a check on this Ltd Company's financial state and check that the address of directors are not accommodation addresses if they want more comfort.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards