Ready, steady… save!
You don’t need a chart to join in. Here are 2 ways to record your savings:
1. Cross it off
Pop a chart into your first post. Saved an amount? Cross it out! Read more »
£0.01 £0.02 £0.03
2. Write it down
Skip the chart and add updates to your first post. Read more »
“Another +£3 saved today. Go me!”
Use +£ before each new saving so it counts towards your total.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Combi OR Conventional
Comments
-
matelodave wrote: »I much prefer a combi
¬
¬
and I reckon they are more economical.
I think the economy depends on the length of the pipe runs. Too often on a combi you have to 'run off' a lot of water before hot water arrives at the tap. That is why many combi boilers have a small internal HW tank.0 -
I have one of each and prefer the conventional boiler. Possibly because I'm used to it. We had a new boiler installed 4 years ago and with two mixer valve showers we were recommended to replace like for like with a conventional boiler. It has been fine, and with a hive is very controllable. We use the airing cupboard to store towels / bedding etc, so get some use from the space occupied by the tank.
I then bought another house with a 7 year old combi. It seemed to have an issue with providing hot water, so we had to replace the diverter valve. It's an old house and I think the pipe runs may not be direct. Getting hot water still takes a while, particularly if the heating isn't on and the boiler has to fire up specifically.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 355.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 255K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 456.2K Spending & Discounts
- 248.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 606.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 179.1K Life & Family
- 264K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards