We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

s. 75 CCA and goods bought via intermediaries

MSE says here in relation to goods bought via intermediaries:

"If you stand your ground, it's possible to argue that the indirect relationship constitutes an arrangement to pay. The Court of Appeal decided this was acceptable in 2006, but it's unlikely to be an easy task."

Does anyone know what this case is? I've googled it, but just get the OFT v Lloyds Bank case which seems to be about credit card payments abroad.

Thanks

Comments

  • born_again
    born_again Posts: 20,985 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Sixth Anniversary Name Dropper
    Need more information on who, what & when etc.
    Life in the slow lane
  • eskbanker
    eskbanker Posts: 37,837 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Chomeur wrote: »
    MSE says here in relation to goods bought via intermediaries:

    "If you stand your ground, it's possible to argue that the indirect relationship constitutes an arrangement to pay. The Court of Appeal decided this was acceptable in 2006, but it's unlikely to be an easy task."

    Does anyone know what this case is? I've googled it, but just get the OFT v Lloyds Bank case which seems to be about credit card payments abroad.

    Thanks
    My understanding is that MSE are referring to that OFT v Lloyds case, which is documented at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/268.html

    There were two separate aspects being debated, one of which was indeed foreign purchases, but the other was whether a four-party structure can be said to deny s75 rights by being considered a breach of a (three-party) debtor-creditor-supplier chain.

    However, the fourth party analysed in this case was specifically the merchant acquirer (i.e. a bank) rather than an intermediary in the travel agent or PayPal scenarios typically discussed on here, although the final summary doesn't explicitly restrict the judgment to merchant acquirers....
    we have reached the conclusion that connected lender liability under section 75 of the Act attaches to all transactions entered into using credit cards issued under consumer credit agreements regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974, whether they take place within a three- or four-party structure and whether they are entered into in the United Kingdom or elsewhere
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.