We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
ParkingEye beaten close to home
HubertGrumblethorpe
Posts: 71 Forumite
Just for interest .. from the local rag
Case won in Preston Court not far from PE HQ ….
https://www.lep.co.uk/news/traffic-and-travel/i-would-encourage-anyone-who-receives-a-parking-ticket-from-them-to-contest-it-preston-woman-wins-15-month-battle-against-parkingeye-1-10105876
Case won in Preston Court not far from PE HQ ….
https://www.lep.co.uk/news/traffic-and-travel/i-would-encourage-anyone-who-receives-a-parking-ticket-from-them-to-contest-it-preston-woman-wins-15-month-battle-against-parkingeye-1-10105876
0
Comments
-
Jolly good!
The lady was forum assisted by us (I am sure she will post here too).
Another one bites the dust! :TPRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0 -
-
Unless theres further action pending against then its stuff and nonsense, however after reading it would appear that the newspaper has contacted the parking eye.The company, which also took over the running of car parking at the Royal Preston and Chorley Hospitals earlier this year, declined to talk about the outcome.
A spokesman said: “Because it is a legal case we cannot comment on the ruling.”
Shame this episode hasn't ( yet) hurt the principle/restaurant group/chiquitos unless there is a follow up coming.
Big companies/corporates should carry out due dillegence, and in the course of that they should become aware that these parking companies are completly unregulated and make up their own rules to suit themselves
Both so called ATA's are not regulatory authorities ( far from it) but private trade associations who set the rules for their members.
The purpose of a trade association is to look after its members ( the parking companies)
Both the BPA and the IPC are no more than lipstick on a pigFrom the Plain Language Commission:
"The BPA has surely become one of the most socially dangerous organisations in the UK"0 -
From the newspaper article:
Well wide of the mark there. PE made over 1 million DVLA accesses for Registered Keeper data in that year (from memory).A triumphant Carolyn declared: “In 2018 around 52,000 motorists received a parking fine from ParkingEye. The vast majority of those people didn’t have the time or the inclination to contest them.Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

