We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
Unadopted Road which is also a Public footpath - who should maintain and pay for it?

Bradders123
Posts: 2 Newbie
I've recently inherited a property along an unadopted road which is also a public footpath. According to the deeds in 1962 it says 'Are the Highways (including footpaths) abutting on the property maintained at the public expense?' Answer was stated as being 'Yes'. However, over the years the residents along this road have paid for gravel and the council have put up speed limit signs. The existing residents say they are now 'too old' to maintain the road and as I'm 'new' and much younger 'that it is now entirely my responsibility'. Is this right? How can this be right? The road has now deteriorated as so many vehicles use it including public vehicles and also a lot of people walk along there and I'm concerned as to who is liable for any accidents that may occur if someone trips up in one of the potholes or a car is damaged in one of the potholes. The road doesn't have any streetlights. I'm not a qualified construction/road worker, neither am I rich as I still have a family to support, so don't feel able to take on this onerous task on my own. Who is responsible for the cost of maintenance? The 'owner' of the road is not registered with the land registry but it is obvious from the deeds that it is owned by the church as this was who the land was purchased off originally and the land on the other side of the road is still owned by the church but leased by the local town council? Can any one give me some advice please? I'm very stressed out about this, particularly as I'm also recently bereaved!
0
Comments
-
Bradders123 wrote: »According to the deeds in 1962 it says 'Are the Highways (including footpaths) abutting on the property maintained at the public expense?' Answer was stated as being 'Yes'.0
-
Many thanks for replying so promptly. The 'it' refers to the 'Register of Local Land Charges document which was in with the other deed documents . This is what was requested prior to the building of my property.0
-
I think your options are likely to be:
-collectively maintain the road with the other houses.
- pay for the road to be brought up to adoptable standard and convince the local highway authority to adopt it.
- sell the house.0 -
Bradders123 wrote: »Many thanks for replying so promptly. The 'it' refers to the 'Register of Local Land Charges document which was in with the other deed documents . This is what was requested prior to the building of my property.
Ok - I think it's worth checking with the council whether the road is in fact still adopted, and if not, when and how it ceased to be adopted. The other possibility is what you're looking at was faulty information at the time.0 -
Bradders123 wrote: »I've recently inherited a property along an unadopted road which is also a public footpath. According to the deeds in 1962 it says 'Are the Highways (including footpaths) abutting on the property maintained at the public expense?' Answer was stated as being 'Yes'. However, over the years the residents along this road have paid for gravel and the council have put up speed limit signs. The existing residents say they are now 'too old' to maintain the road and as I'm 'new' and much younger 'that it is now entirely my responsibility'. Is this right? How can this be right? The road has now deteriorated as so many vehicles use it including public vehicles and also a lot of people walk along there and I'm concerned as to who is liable for any accidents that may occur if someone trips up in one of the potholes or a car is damaged in one of the potholes. The road doesn't have any streetlights. I'm not a qualified construction/road worker, neither am I rich as I still have a family to support, so don't feel able to take on this onerous task on my own. Who is responsible for the cost of maintenance? The 'owner' of the road is not registered with the land registry but it is obvious from the deeds that it is owned by the church as this was who the land was purchased off originally and the land on the other side of the road is still owned by the church but leased by the local town council? Can any one give me some advice please? I'm very stressed out about this, particularly as I'm also recently bereaved!
An old person expecting the young to look after them.....surely not
Even i know that is not how it works.If any of you responsible for maintenance then it will say in your/neighbours paperworkAn answer isn't spam just because you don't like it......0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 349.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453K Spending & Discounts
- 242.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.4K Life & Family
- 255.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards