We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Rent or buy at 44?

24

Comments

  • zagubov
    zagubov Posts: 17,956 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    From your answers, I'd probably go for buying in your situation.
    More than one bedroom's a good idea (or failing that, maybe a bedroom + study even).
    There is no honour to be had in not knowing a thing that can be known - Danny Baker
  • kangoora
    kangoora Posts: 1,193 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    In your situation I'm pretty sure I'd be looking to buy.

    Personally I'd be looking for a 2 bed and try to get a bungalow if affordable so you could avoid moving again. Maybe look at a decent bed/settee for the living room for son when visiting. You may get more house for your money with a semi obviously.

    I concur with most posters that it is far better to own your own home when 60+ rather than chance being kicked out by a landlord in your 60s/70s.
  • kangoora wrote: »
    In your situation I'm pretty sure I'd be looking to buy.

    Personally I'd be looking for a 2 bed and try to get a bungalow if affordable so you could avoid moving again. Maybe look at a decent bed/settee for the living room for son when visiting. You may get more house for your money with a semi obviously.

    I concur with most posters that it is far better to own your own home when 60+ rather than chance being kicked out by a landlord in your 60s/70s.


    A bungalow at 44!! :eek:
  • sevenhills
    sevenhills Posts: 5,938 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    jammiev wrote: »
    I am 44 and have no debts at all. Currently renting a room from a friend.

    I earn £39k per year. Could retire at 55 to 67!


    If you have the option to retire at 55+ can can assume that you have ample funds to buy, otherwise you wouldnt be thinking about retiring.
    I bought at the age of 55 with a 11 year mortgage. Lots of things to concider, if you are thinking about travelling yet still owning a house in the UK.
    Personally I think owning a house is good for anyones investment portfolio.
  • My sister owned whilst married with kids but when they left home, she sold up with the intention of buying in Spain (idea abandoned) then getting back on the ladder in the UK.


    Unfortunately she spent her way through the capital she had and now, aged 60, cannot buy. She is sick of moving house every couple of years as landlords decide they want their property back or sell up etc.


    If you want security into retirement, then buy. If you don't plan to move up the "ladder", then is very unlikely you will need to let a 25 year mortgage run it's term. Aged 44, you can get a 25 year mortgage then make some effort to clear it by retirement which will mean fairly small overpayments.


    If you have the deposit to buy, then for long terms security alone, I would do it.
    Signature on holiday for two weeks
  • ReadingTim
    ReadingTim Posts: 4,087 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    jammiev wrote: »
    Could retire at 55 to 67!

    Dunno what your pension income will be, but that will need to include rent for the rest of your life.

    Buy a place now and there's a reasonable chance you will have paid it off by the time you retire, allowing you to live rent free for the rest of your days. To me, this would make for a far more pleasant retirement.
  • PasturesNew
    PasturesNew Posts: 70,698 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    ReadingTim wrote: »
    Dunno what your pension income will be, but that will need to include rent for the rest of your life.

    Buy a place now and there's a reasonable chance you will have paid it off by the time you retire, allowing you to live rent free for the rest of your days. To me, this would make for a far more pleasant retirement.

    For those on lower incomes, "just state pension and minimum top ups", rent is also paid. What would be a struggle though would be perpetual moving costs/new deposits/new rents up front each time a LL wanted to sell up.
  • ReadingTim
    ReadingTim Posts: 4,087 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    For those on lower incomes, "just state pension and minimum top ups", rent is also paid. What would be a struggle though would be perpetual moving costs/new deposits/new rents up front each time a LL wanted to sell up.

    Is the £39k the OP mentioned a "lower income"? Is his/her rent therefore paid? 'Cos that's the question I was answering...
  • Cisco001
    Cisco001 Posts: 4,251 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Go ahead and getting a house.
    3 bed semi and rent a room out would be a good idea.
  • PasturesNew
    PasturesNew Posts: 70,698 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    ReadingTim wrote: »
    Is the £39k the OP mentioned a "lower income"? Is his/her rent therefore paid? 'Cos that's the question I was answering...

    Income today doesn't mean a significant pension when the time comes in 20-25 years' time.

    Circumstances change. He could be "stuck" on £39k forever, until it's worth the equivalent of £12k.

    I was just 'correcting' the idea that rent will always come out of Pension income and that'd only be the case if one's income were sufficient.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.