We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
POFA Appeal
Icanseearadiator
Posts: 1 Newbie
Hello
I have received a PCN postal notice to Driver/ Hirer for a lease car. The Notice to keeper was provided to the hire company, and they have provided the parking company with my address as hirer (clearly stated hirer not driver; several people are insured on the vehicle and the driver has not been disclosed). Parking co is NCP.
From the NEWBIE thread and forums it seems that the recommended dispute template is the Edna Basher template (thanks Edna) for example in this thread: forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.php?p=69859059#post69859059
Just want to check; I think the time requirements for the Notice to Hirer in Paras 13 and 14 have been met, therefore is the non-compliance likely to be that the relevant docs in POFA 13(2) have not been provided (they have not) within the timelimits? Or is the main purpose at this point to get a POPLA Code to dispute through that?
My concern is if they have met paras 13 and 14 of POFA then the dispute will just be rejected... Thanks in advance
I have received a PCN postal notice to Driver/ Hirer for a lease car. The Notice to keeper was provided to the hire company, and they have provided the parking company with my address as hirer (clearly stated hirer not driver; several people are insured on the vehicle and the driver has not been disclosed). Parking co is NCP.
From the NEWBIE thread and forums it seems that the recommended dispute template is the Edna Basher template (thanks Edna) for example in this thread: forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.php?p=69859059#post69859059
Just want to check; I think the time requirements for the Notice to Hirer in Paras 13 and 14 have been met, therefore is the non-compliance likely to be that the relevant docs in POFA 13(2) have not been provided (they have not) within the timelimits? Or is the main purpose at this point to get a POPLA Code to dispute through that?
My concern is if they have met paras 13 and 14 of POFA then the dispute will just be rejected... Thanks in advance
0
Comments
-
You have found the right template appeal.
As you say, their failure will be the non-supply of the documents specified in POFA 13(2).
They haven't met POFA 14(2)(a), have they?
Your concern is unfounded.
If NCP don't accept your initial appeal, this will be an easy win at PoPLA.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards