We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Passive funds that cap the top holdings?

Does anyone know of any passive/low cost funds that cap the top holdings?

I personally don't like holding so much in one company, Apple, Microsoft etc
«13

Comments

  • Prism
    Prism Posts: 3,852 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Does anyone know of any passive/low cost funds that cap the top holdings?

    I personally don't like holding so much in one company, Apple, Microsoft etc

    What % do you want to cap them at. Also, why?
  • Prism wrote: »
    What % do you want to cap them at. Also, why?

    Maybe 1%.
    I would prefer if lesser money was concentrated in a few companies incase those companies prices drops significantly
  • Prism
    Prism Posts: 3,852 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    You could try an equal weighted tracker but the performance will likely not be as good.
  • ruperts
    ruperts Posts: 3,673 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Not a cap as such but I believe you can buy equal weighted funds, maybe ETFs, where all constituents of the relevant index are given equal weight.

    Edit. Prism beat me to it.
  • AnotherJoe
    AnotherJoe Posts: 19,622 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    Though of course you'd get less when they rose. You'd never get the rise from Apple, Microsoft etc in the first place so one would cancel the other out so is it necessary to do this. ? Say Apple fell by 75% so it went to 1%. Well you'd be no worse off than if the fund held it at 1% in the first place.
    Sounds to me you're after an active fund that doesn't let any one company get too large, but it won't be passive. I think there are passives that do things like hold equal weighting's of shares in an index but then you'd get nothing at all like the performance of the index.
  • Prism
    Prism Posts: 3,852 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I'm pretty much the opposite. Of my entire equity allocation my whole top 10 is above 2% each. I would rather each company be meaningful, either up or down.
  • Tom99
    Tom99 Posts: 5,371 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary
    Prism wrote: »
    You could try an equal weighted tracker but the performance will likely not be as good.
    Is there a comparison available anywhere to show that?
  • Prism
    Prism Posts: 3,852 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Tom99 wrote: »
    Is there a comparison available anywhere to show that?

    Mainly because it will be trading more to keep holdings equal. A short term example of 5 years is the Xtrackers S&P 500 equal weight ETF which has underperformed its market cap equivalent by around 2% per year.
  • JohnWinder
    JohnWinder Posts: 1,862 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Where do folk put their money when they all get out of Microsoft? Into other shares, which you'll own anyway as you invest in broad based index trackers. Or into bonds, which you hold for the same reason. Into cash long term... I don't think so. But that's idle speculation.

    Here are four case studies comparing how equally weighted indices compare to their more typical market capitalization weighted cousins...... Now read on:
    https://www.lynalden.com/equal-weighted-index-funds/
  • AnotherJoe
    AnotherJoe Posts: 19,622 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 10 November 2019 at 9:58AM
    A very interesting read, thanks JW. I wonder if there are world trackers than do equal weighting run by the likes of HSBC and vanguard?,

    Edit: I see vanguard are opposed to this on principle. So they don't do them.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.