We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
IPC now quotes a 28 day NTK.
Garyswork2
Posts: 58 Forumite
This is more FYI, but still contravenes POFA Schedule 4.
Essentially the International Parking Community have amended their Code of Practice as of Nov 1st 2019 by upping their NTK from the statutory 14 days to 28 days.
See 17.3 & 17.6 on page 22.
https://theipc.info/brandings/2/resources/documents/Code%20of%20Practice%20v7.pdf
Feel free to discuss as I am defending a 25 day out of time claim pre dating this amendment.
Essentially the International Parking Community have amended their Code of Practice as of Nov 1st 2019 by upping their NTK from the statutory 14 days to 28 days.
See 17.3 & 17.6 on page 22.
https://theipc.info/brandings/2/resources/documents/Code%20of%20Practice%20v7.pdf
Feel free to discuss as I am defending a 25 day out of time claim pre dating this amendment.
0
Comments
-
Nothing to do with PoFA, this section of the CoP refers to 'Warning Notices', as in 'Your vehicle was parked at {location}. Please note, this is a Permit Only car park. Please do not park here again'.
Why send out a £100 penalty, when a good old Warning Notice would do the business?
Answers on the head of a pin please!Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street0 -
I imagine that the printing costs for these "warning notices" could be as much a £0 per annum!0
-
Doesn't affect my claim then.
The change in NTK seems a little wishy washy
i.e. Notice to Keeper – Postal Notification where no Notice to Driver was issued
(see paragraph m for Notices)
0 -
The scammers ATA has changed their made up rules. So what?
It does not affect the PoFA nor does it change any of the advice or the actions motorists should take.
A non-PoFA compliant NTK is still non compliant no matter how the scammers word their scam notices.
You can't polish a turd.I married my cousin. I had to...I don't have a sister.
All my screwdrivers are cordless."You're Safety Is My Primary Concern Dear" - Laks0 -
That's pretty much what I'm hoping for as there is so much written in the IPC CoP about not relying on POFA12 that reading it makes you think that they are actually above the law!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards