PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Council tax liability (HMO) ??

Options
2»

Comments

  • inama
    inama Posts: 11 Forumite
    Third Anniversary First Post
    buggy_boy wrote: »
    I think you are getting confused. The LL is in the eyes of the council liable for council tax, the reason councils do this is because they know LL's are less likely to default and disappear than tenants. You are contractually liable to pay the council tax, this can be paid either directly to the council or to the LL who can pay the council, it makes no difference.

    In no way are you "off the hook" for council tax.

    Where you may be able to argue though and I think correctly is if you have 4 tenants and each tenants contract says the same thing I would argue that each tenant is liable for 25% of the council tax, this is regardless of their exempt status. Their status of exempt having to pay CT is to the council however they still have a contractual liability to pay.

    The reason I make this argument is because the wording is not clear and if there was no exempt persons each tenant would not be expected to pay the full council tax bill on their share.

    You may also be able to get a single persons discount as all others in the property are exempt.

    With regard to the question about not being an HMO on the contract I think it would be pretty clear that it was an HMO so I don't think that would hold any weight.

    Thanks, I did assume that if I did have to pay council tax it would only be my share - 25%, but this has not happened in my case.

    In response to it is clear that this is a HMO property, I wouldn’t say it is entirely clear as I don’t know the types of agreements the previous tenants have had, whether it was joint or separate and they also did not have a license.

    The landlord has just told me that until the 25% student discount has been applied, I should pay the entire cost to him, which is actually quite unreasonable.
  • CIS
    CIS Posts: 12,260 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I think you are getting confused. The LL is in the eyes of the council liable for council tax, the reason councils do this is because they know LL's are less likely to default and disappear than tenants
    It's undertaken because it's the way legislation works, it's not a council decision.
    You may also be able to get a single persons discount as all others in the property are exempt.
    The other occupiers are disregarded, not exempt (exempt has a specific usage in council tax legislation).
    In response to it is clear that this is a HMO property, I wouldn’t say it is entirely clear as I don’t know the types of agreements the previous tenants have had, whether it was joint or separate and they also did not have a license.
    As a council tax HMO the simple fact that it's one property where rooms are individually let makes it a council tax HMO regardless of anything else (although most people would not know it).
    The landlord has just told me that until the 25% student discount has been applied, I should pay the entire cost to him, which is actually quite unreasonable.
    It is now down to a contractual argument between you and the landlord.
    I no longer work in Council Tax Recovery but instead work as a specialist Council Tax paralegal assisting landlords and Council Tax payers with council tax disputes and valuation tribunals. My views are my own reading of the law and you should always check with the local authority in question.
  • diggingdude
    diggingdude Posts: 2,492 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    You should look to move. By sharing with students you are getting hammered twice
    1) paying all the council tax
    2) being in a higher tax band property than 1 person would need.

    By taking on students the landlord has screwed you over. Find a professional house share
    An answer isn't spam just because you don't like it......
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.