We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Do I have a lease or a license to rent my current home? My landlord hasn't put my deposit away?
jess_d_docs
Posts: 6 Forumite
Hi all,
Myself and my boyfriend live in a room in a shared flat in London. We rent from a couple working under the company title 'EasyRoom4You'.
As the landlords have been dodgy, to say the least, in other parts of the contract, I had already asked them for our deposit scheme certificate as I suspected they probably had not put our money away safely. They haven't - on the grounds that I am a 'licensed occupier' rather than a 'tenant'.
I've been looking into this and I can't seem to find a definite answer for my rights here.
We have a fixed-term agreement from 1st June to 1st December. The contract is titled 'License agreement', but refers to us constantly as the 'tenant'.
Our rent covers the room we live in plus a shared kitchen and bathroom with two other flatmates.
On their website, in their FAQ section, it says: "you sign an Assured Shorthold License agreement and you will receive a copy of our agreement which you are entitled to keep."
The landlord said in a reply to my request for the deposit certificate: "I can see you have signed a license agreement rather than a tenancy agreement because you are renting a room rather than the whole property. License agreements deposit normally don’t go into a scheme. However I can assure you deposit will be fully refunded if the room handed back to us under al of our terms and in a good condition." [direct quote]
In Street v Mountford [1985], Lord Templeman identified three essential criteria for a lease:
1. the grant of exclusive possession
2. for a period of time which is certain
3. the payment of rent
We have exclusive possession of the room, but not the entire flat.
Is our landlord allowed to classify us in this way and avoid abiding by the deposit protection scheme requirement based on this?
I'm so confused! Thanks so much!
[Side note: I'll be honest, we didn't thoroughly scan the contract as much as we have done for previous flat-shares. We suddenly had an urgent need for accommodation as our house buying process got indefinitely delayed. The flat we're renting from was in the right area and available immediately so we took it quickly.]
Myself and my boyfriend live in a room in a shared flat in London. We rent from a couple working under the company title 'EasyRoom4You'.
As the landlords have been dodgy, to say the least, in other parts of the contract, I had already asked them for our deposit scheme certificate as I suspected they probably had not put our money away safely. They haven't - on the grounds that I am a 'licensed occupier' rather than a 'tenant'.
I've been looking into this and I can't seem to find a definite answer for my rights here.
We have a fixed-term agreement from 1st June to 1st December. The contract is titled 'License agreement', but refers to us constantly as the 'tenant'.
Our rent covers the room we live in plus a shared kitchen and bathroom with two other flatmates.
On their website, in their FAQ section, it says: "you sign an Assured Shorthold License agreement and you will receive a copy of our agreement which you are entitled to keep."
The landlord said in a reply to my request for the deposit certificate: "I can see you have signed a license agreement rather than a tenancy agreement because you are renting a room rather than the whole property. License agreements deposit normally don’t go into a scheme. However I can assure you deposit will be fully refunded if the room handed back to us under al of our terms and in a good condition." [direct quote]
In Street v Mountford [1985], Lord Templeman identified three essential criteria for a lease:
1. the grant of exclusive possession
2. for a period of time which is certain
3. the payment of rent
We have exclusive possession of the room, but not the entire flat.
Is our landlord allowed to classify us in this way and avoid abiding by the deposit protection scheme requirement based on this?
I'm so confused! Thanks so much!
[Side note: I'll be honest, we didn't thoroughly scan the contract as much as we have done for previous flat-shares. We suddenly had an urgent need for accommodation as our house buying process got indefinitely delayed. The flat we're renting from was in the right area and available immediately so we took it quickly.]
0
Comments
-
When you say you have exlusive posession of one room - it usually means that you can lock the door (of your room) behind yourself and be sure that no one besides yourself and your partner have the right to enter the room. Is that the case?0
-
Yes we have a key and we lock the door of our room each day.0
-
That's good. And can/does the LL/others enter your room without prior permission (say for cleaning, routine maintenance, etc)?jess_d_docs wrote: »Yes we have a key and we lock the door of our room each day.0
-
Retired_Mortgage_Adviser wrote: »That's good. And can/does the LL/others enter your room without prior permission (say for cleaning, routine maintenance, etc)?
No. No one can enter our room without a written request. The cleaner only cleans the bathroom and kitchen. At the moment, our radiator is broken so the landlord has asked if he can enter the room to identify the problem.0 -
It sounds very much like you're a lodger in the home rather than a tenant as a lodger usually rents the room they're sleeping in together with sharing bathroom, kitchen etc. If you are a lodger rather than a tenant then there is no requirement for the landlord to use the tenant deposit scheme.
(Apologies - I assumed you were flatsharing with the landlord - if live out landlord then none of the above apply).
All depends on the exact wording of the agreement you've signed.0 -
Does the landlord live in the same house as you?0
-
Irishsmurfy wrote: »It sounds very much like you're a lodger in the home rather than a tenant
I would disagree - Having a couple of lodgers myself, I make it clear that no locks are fitted on internal doors (thumb latches excluded), and access to the rooms is required for safety checks, maintenance, and (sometimes) cleaning. Being a lodger brings with it very little in the way of legal protections - No requirement to secure the deposit in a recognised scheme is one.
By the sounds of it, the OP is in a small HMO, especially if the LL is non-resident.Any language construct that forces such insanity in this case should be abandoned without regrets. –
Erik Aronesty, 2014
Treasure the moments that you have. Savour them for as long as you can for they will never come back again.0 -
My understanding is that the landlord does not live there.
If so, then whatever the contract says, this is an AST. OP is a tenant in a shared property. All tenancy leglislation applies:
* deposit protecion
* S21 if LL wants possession
* EPC, gas report, gov leaflet
etc
The LL is simply attempting to convince his tenants they have fewer rights than they actually do.
The question is what does OP want to achieve, and when?0 -
gingercordial wrote: »Does the landlord live in the same house as you?
No. Just two other tenants.0 -
My understanding is that the landlord does not live there.
If so, then whatever the contract says, this is an AST. OP is a tenant in a shared property. All tenancy leglislation applies:
* deposit protecion
* S21 if LL wants possession
* EPC, gas report, gov leaflet
etc
The LL is simply attempting to convince his tenants they have fewer rights than they actually do.
The question is what does OP want to achieve, and when?
Thank you so much! I also thought the landlord was being very shifty about this - they have continuously attempted to bend the rules at our expense. They recently tried to tell us that although our contract ends on 1st December, we can't leave until January 'because it's hard to find tenants over Christmas'.
I wanted to find out what our rights were as I couldn't find any clear answer on the internet so thank you so much to everyone for your help. I have a very strong suspicion the landlord will attempt to withhold our deposit - there are various people saying this company has not paid back their deposit - so I wanted to get all of the facts early. Even if our deposit does come back in full, I expect we will probably apply for compensation for it never being in a deposit scheme. These landlords can't keep getting away with it!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.6K Life & Family
- 262K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
